mbox series

[RFC,vfs/for-next,0/1] Only set epoll timeout if it's in the future

Message ID 20250415184346.39229-1-jdamato@fastly.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Only set epoll timeout if it's in the future | expand

Message

Joe Damato April 15, 2025, 6:43 p.m. UTC 
Greetings:

Sending as an RFC against vfs/for-next because I am not sure which
branch to send this against.

It's possible this should be against vfs.fixes with a Fixes
bf3b9f6372c4 ("epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket
fds."), but I am not sure.

The commit message explains the issue in detail, please see the commit
message for details.

If this patch is appropriate, please let me know:
  - which branch to generate the patch against (I suspect vfs/for-next
    is wrong),
  - whether to include the fixes tag mentioned above or if this is
    considered "new code" instead of a bug fix and I'll omit the fixes.

I'll re-send as instructed (without this cover letter)... or not if this
patch is incorrect/not desirable :)

Thanks,
Joe

Joe Damato (1):
  eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the future

 fs/eventpoll.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: 2e72b1e0aac24a12f3bf3eec620efaca7ab7d4de