Message ID | 1438235311-23788-26-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Am 30.07.2015 um 07:48 schrieb Dongsheng Yang: > Initialize quota and alloc a inode quota information in > ubifs_new_inode(). Then quota would be aware of a new > inode is allocated. > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > fs/ubifs/dir.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > index 8d93427..5bfce44 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c > +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ > */ > > #include "ubifs.h" > +#include <linux/quotaops.h> > > /** > * inherit_flags - inherit flags of the parent inode. > @@ -90,12 +91,13 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir, > { > struct inode *inode; > struct ubifs_inode *ui; > + int err = 0; > > inode = new_inode(c->vfs_sb); > - ui = ubifs_inode(inode); > if (!inode) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > + ui = ubifs_inode(inode); Seems like an unrelated change. All ubifs_inode() does is a container_of(), inode = NULL won't hurt. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 08/09/2015 05:43 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 30.07.2015 um 07:48 schrieb Dongsheng Yang: >> Initialize quota and alloc a inode quota information in >> ubifs_new_inode(). Then quota would be aware of a new >> inode is allocated. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> fs/ubifs/dir.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c >> index 8d93427..5bfce44 100644 >> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c >> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c >> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ >> */ >> >> #include "ubifs.h" >> +#include <linux/quotaops.h> >> >> /** >> * inherit_flags - inherit flags of the parent inode. >> @@ -90,12 +91,13 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir, >> { >> struct inode *inode; >> struct ubifs_inode *ui; >> + int err = 0; >> >> inode = new_inode(c->vfs_sb); >> - ui = ubifs_inode(inode); >> if (!inode) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> >> + ui = ubifs_inode(inode); > > Seems like an unrelated change. > All ubifs_inode() does is a container_of(), inode = NULL won't hurt. My bad, I planed to split this patch, but forgot it. Yes, as you said, inode = NULL won't hurt, but I think checking inode following new_inode() directly before using it seems more reasonable. Although it's obvious that's okey to experts like you, I believe this change could make the logic more "correct" to others. :) It's a trivial fix from my opinion, do you think that's worthy? Yang > > Thanks, > //richard > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c index 8d93427..5bfce44 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ */ #include "ubifs.h" +#include <linux/quotaops.h> /** * inherit_flags - inherit flags of the parent inode. @@ -90,12 +91,13 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir, { struct inode *inode; struct ubifs_inode *ui; + int err = 0; inode = new_inode(c->vfs_sb); - ui = ubifs_inode(inode); if (!inode) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + ui = ubifs_inode(inode); /* * Set 'S_NOCMTIME' to prevent VFS form updating [mc]time of inodes and * marking them dirty in file write path (see 'file_update_time()'). @@ -109,6 +111,11 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir, ubifs_current_time(inode); inode->i_mapping->nrpages = 0; + dquot_initialize(inode); + err = dquot_alloc_inode(inode); + if (err) + goto fail_drop; + switch (mode & S_IFMT) { case S_IFREG: inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ubifs_file_address_operations; @@ -148,8 +155,8 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir, spin_unlock(&c->cnt_lock); ubifs_err(c, "out of inode numbers"); make_bad_inode(inode); - iput(inode); - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + err = -EINVAL; + goto fail_free; } ubifs_warn(c, "running out of inode numbers (current %lu, max %u)", (unsigned long)c->highest_inum, INUM_WATERMARK); @@ -166,6 +173,13 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir, ui->creat_sqnum = ++c->max_sqnum; spin_unlock(&c->cnt_lock); return inode; + +fail_free: + dquot_free_inode(inode); +fail_drop: + dquot_drop(inode); + iput(inode); + return ERR_PTR(err); } static int dbg_check_name(const struct ubifs_info *c,
Initialize quota and alloc a inode quota information in ubifs_new_inode(). Then quota would be aware of a new inode is allocated. Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/ubifs/dir.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)