Message ID | 1443167034-67530-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 00:43 -0700, Greg Thelen wrote: > Since commit 5cec38ac866b ("fs, seq_file: fallback to vmalloc instead of > oom kill processes") seq_buf_alloc() avoids calling the oom killer for > PAGE_SIZE or smaller allocations; but larger allocations can use the oom > killer via vmalloc(). Thus reads of small files can return ENOMEM, but > larger files use the oom killer to avoid ENOMEM. > > Memory overcommit requires use of the oom killer to select a victim > regardless of file size. > > Enable oom killer for small seq_buf_alloc() allocations. > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> > --- Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Thanks guys. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c index 225586e141ca..a8e288755f24 100644 --- a/fs/seq_file.c +++ b/fs/seq_file.c @@ -25,12 +25,17 @@ static void seq_set_overflow(struct seq_file *m) static void *seq_buf_alloc(unsigned long size) { void *buf; + gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL; /* - * __GFP_NORETRY to avoid oom-killings with high-order allocations - - * it's better to fall back to vmalloc() than to kill things. + * For high order allocations, use __GFP_NORETRY to avoid oom-killing - + * it's better to fall back to vmalloc() than to kill things. For small + * allocations, just use GFP_KERNEL which will oom kill, thus no need + * for vmalloc fallback. */ - buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN); + if (size > PAGE_SIZE) + gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN; + buf = kmalloc(size, gfp); if (!buf && size > PAGE_SIZE) buf = vmalloc(size); return buf;