| Message ID | 1449846859-19375-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index e9db118..c57d133 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -6296,8 +6296,8 @@ nfs4_listxattr_nfs4_label(struct inode *inode, char *list, size_t list_len) int len = 0; if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL)) { - len = security_inode_listsecurity(inode, list, len); - if (len > list_len) + len = security_inode_listsecurity(inode, list, list_len); + if (list_len && len > list_len) return -ERANGE; } return len;
Al, here is another fix for the same botched nfs commit. Could you please also merge / fold that? Sorry for the mess. Thanks, Andreas -- Fix another regression introduced in d77ae742: listxattr ended up always failing with -ERANGE on NFSv4.2 mounts with security label support. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)