@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void smaps_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
if (radix_tree_exceptional_entry(page))
mss->swap += PAGE_SIZE;
else
- page_cache_release(page);
+ put_page(page);
return;
}
@@ -279,12 +279,12 @@ static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (!page)
return VM_FAULT_OOM;
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
- offset = (loff_t) index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ offset = (loff_t) index << PAGE_SHIFT;
buf = __va((page_to_pfn(page) << PAGE_SHIFT));
rc = __read_vmcore(buf, PAGE_SIZE, &offset, 0);
if (rc < 0) {
unlock_page(page);
- page_cache_release(page);
+ put_page(page);
return (rc == -ENOMEM) ? VM_FAULT_OOM : VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
}
SetPageUptodate(page);
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> --- fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +- fs/proc/vmcore.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)