| Message ID | 1458499278-1516-6-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c b/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c index 0f3da2cb2bd6..255c7eec4481 100644 --- a/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c +++ b/arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ static int hypfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) sbi->uid = current_uid(); sbi->gid = current_gid(); sb->s_fs_info = sbi; - sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; - sb->s_blocksize_bits = PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT; + sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_SIZE; + sb->s_blocksize_bits = PAGE_SHIFT; sb->s_magic = HYPFS_MAGIC; sb->s_op = &hypfs_s_ops; if (hypfs_parse_options(data, sb))
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> --- arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)