@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ retry:
copy_to_page(new_page, vaddr, &opcode, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE);
ret = __replace_page(vma, vaddr, old_page, new_page);
- page_cache_release(new_page);
+ put_page(new_page);
put_old:
put_page(old_page);
@@ -539,14 +539,14 @@ static int __copy_insn(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
* see uprobe_register().
*/
if (mapping->a_ops->readpage)
- page = read_mapping_page(mapping, offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, filp);
+ page = read_mapping_page(mapping, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, filp);
else
- page = shmem_read_mapping_page(mapping, offset >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
+ page = shmem_read_mapping_page(mapping, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
if (IS_ERR(page))
return PTR_ERR(page);
copy_from_page(page, offset, insn, nbytes);
- page_cache_release(page);
+ put_page(page);
return 0;
}
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> --- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)