From patchwork Thu Dec 1 21:20:57 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Richard Weinberger X-Patchwork-Id: 9456985 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E039760235 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10D528542 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id C5B5E28541; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:26:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D8B28542 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932479AbcLAVZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:25:51 -0500 Received: from mail.sigma-star.at ([95.130.255.111]:46001 "EHLO mail.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759269AbcLAVV2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:21:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC93824E000D; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:21:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux.site (richard.vpn.sigmapriv.at [10.3.0.5]) by mail.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E967124E0008; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:21:24 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Weinberger To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Cc: david@sigma-star.at, tytso@mit.edu, dedekind1@gmail.com, ebiggers@google.com, mhalcrow@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, dengler@linutronix.de, sbabic@denx.de, wd@denx.de, Richard Weinberger Subject: [PATCH 10/24] ubifs: Massage assert in ubifs_xattr_set() wrt. fscrypto Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:20:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1480627271-10441-11-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.3 In-Reply-To: <1480627271-10441-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1480627271-10441-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP When we're creating a new inode in UBIFS the inode is not yet exposed and fscrypto calls ubifs_xattr_set() without holding the inode mutex. This is okay but ubifs_xattr_set() has to know about this. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger --- fs/ubifs/xattr.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c index 77ffc9788f45..da59ea3b50c4 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c @@ -289,7 +289,13 @@ int ubifs_xattr_set(struct inode *host, const char *name, const void *value, union ubifs_key key; int err; - ubifs_assert(inode_is_locked(host)); + /* + * Creating an encryption context is done unlocked since we + * operate on a new inode which is not visible to other users + * at this point. + */ + if (strcmp(name, UBIFS_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT) != 0) + ubifs_assert(inode_is_locked(host)); if (size > UBIFS_MAX_INO_DATA) return -ERANGE;