| Message ID | 1482174768-104224-1-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 19.12.2016 20:12, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > > The ubifs encryption ioctls did not work when called by a 32-bit program > on a 64-bit kernel. Since 'struct fscrypt_policy' is not affected by > the word size, ubifs just needs to allow these ioctls through, like what > ext4 and f2fs do. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> > --- > fs/ubifs/ioctl.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c > index 78d7136..da519ba 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c > +++ b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c > @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ long ubifs_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS: > cmd = FS_IOC_SETFLAGS; > break; > + case FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: > + case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: > + break; Whoops, since I tested most of the time on an ARM board, this was unnoticed. :-D Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c index 78d7136..da519ba 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ long ubifs_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS: cmd = FS_IOC_SETFLAGS; break; + case FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: + case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY: + break; default: return -ENOIOCTLCMD; }