[4/6,linux-next] fs/affs: use octal for permissions

Commit Message

Fabian Frederick Jan. 3, 2017, 9:30 p.m. UTC

According to commit f90774e1fd27
("checkpatch: look for symbolic permissions and suggest octal instead")

Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <[e-mail]>
---
 fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/fs/affs/amigaffs.c b/fs/affs/amigaffs.c
index 0ec65c1..fd7a754 100644
--- a/fs/affs/amigaffs.c
+++ b/fs/affs/amigaffs.c
@@ -391,23 +391,23 @@  prot_to_mode(u32 prot)
 	umode_t mode = 0;
 
 	if (!(prot & FIBF_NOWRITE))
-		mode |= S_IWUSR;
+		mode |= 0200;
 	if (!(prot & FIBF_NOREAD))
-		mode |= S_IRUSR;
+		mode |= 0400;
 	if (!(prot & FIBF_NOEXECUTE))
-		mode |= S_IXUSR;
+		mode |= 0100;
 	if (prot & FIBF_GRP_WRITE)
-		mode |= S_IWGRP;
+		mode |= 0020;
 	if (prot & FIBF_GRP_READ)
-		mode |= S_IRGRP;
+		mode |= 0040;
 	if (prot & FIBF_GRP_EXECUTE)
-		mode |= S_IXGRP;
+		mode |= 0010;
 	if (prot & FIBF_OTR_WRITE)
-		mode |= S_IWOTH;
+		mode |= 0002;
 	if (prot & FIBF_OTR_READ)
-		mode |= S_IROTH;
+		mode |= 0004;
 	if (prot & FIBF_OTR_EXECUTE)
-		mode |= S_IXOTH;
+		mode |= 0001;
 
 	return mode;
 }
@@ -418,23 +418,23 @@  mode_to_prot(struct inode *inode)
 	u32 prot = AFFS_I(inode)->i_protect;
 	umode_t mode = inode->i_mode;
 
-	if (!(mode & S_IXUSR))
+	if (!(mode & 0100))
 		prot |= FIBF_NOEXECUTE;
-	if (!(mode & S_IRUSR))
+	if (!(mode & 0400))
 		prot |= FIBF_NOREAD;
-	if (!(mode & S_IWUSR))
+	if (!(mode & 0200))
 		prot |= FIBF_NOWRITE;
-	if (mode & S_IXGRP)
+	if (mode & 0010)
 		prot |= FIBF_GRP_EXECUTE;
-	if (mode & S_IRGRP)
+	if (mode & 0040)
 		prot |= FIBF_GRP_READ;
-	if (mode & S_IWGRP)
+	if (mode & 0020)
 		prot |= FIBF_GRP_WRITE;
-	if (mode & S_IXOTH)
+	if (mode & 0001)
 		prot |= FIBF_OTR_EXECUTE;
-	if (mode & S_IROTH)
+	if (mode & 0004)
 		prot |= FIBF_OTR_READ;
-	if (mode & S_IWOTH)
+	if (mode & 0002)
 		prot |= FIBF_OTR_WRITE;
 
 	AFFS_I(inode)->i_protect = prot;