From patchwork Mon Jan 9 03:33:43 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Byungchul Park X-Patchwork-Id: 13093001 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBC4C67871 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 04:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236879AbjAIEGF (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:06:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54722 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236678AbjAIEE3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:04:29 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo11.lge.com (lgeamrelo13.lge.com [156.147.23.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D630111C30 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO lgemrelse6q.lge.com) (156.147.1.121) by 156.147.23.53 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:53 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.121 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (10.177.244.38) by 156.147.1.121 with ESMTP; 9 Jan 2023 12:33:53 +0900 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.244.38 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com From: Byungchul Park To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, jglisse@redhat.com, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, paolo.valente@linaro.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com, melissa.srw@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, chris.p.wilson@intel.com, gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 15/23] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:33:43 +0900 Message-Id: <1673235231-30302-16-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> References: <1673235231-30302-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cb92173d1f0 ("locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread") was introduced to make lockdep_assert_cpus_held() work in AP thread. However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have to use more than try lock annotation for that. Furthermore, now that Dept was introduced, false positive alarms was reported by that. Replaced it with try lock annotation. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park --- kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 6c0a92c..6a9b9c3 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int lockdep_is_cpus_held(void) static void lockdep_acquire_cpus_lock(void) { - rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + rwsem_acquire(&cpu_hotplug_lock.dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); } static void lockdep_release_cpus_lock(void)