From patchwork Mon Dec 18 12:22:14 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ming Lei X-Patchwork-Id: 10119187 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CC860390 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488C228FBA for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 3D57A28FC4; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EBD28FBA for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933789AbdLRM0B (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:26:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60393 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932833AbdLRMZ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:25:57 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59CF5C04AC40; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-48.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBF76928F; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro , Kent Overstreet Cc: Huang Ying , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Theodore Ts'o , "Darrick J . Wong" , Coly Li , Filipe Manana , Ming Lei Subject: [PATCH V4 12/45] blk-merge: compute bio->bi_seg_front_size efficiently Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 20:22:14 +0800 Message-Id: <20171218122247.3488-13-ming.lei@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171218122247.3488-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> References: <20171218122247.3488-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP It is enough to check and compute bio->bi_seg_front_size just after the 1st segment is found, but current code checks that for each bvec, which is inefficient. This patch follows the way in __blk_recalc_rq_segments() for computing bio->bi_seg_front_size, and it is more efficient and code becomes more readable too. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei --- block/blk-merge.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c index f5dedd57dff6..a476337a8ff4 100644 --- a/block/blk-merge.c +++ b/block/blk-merge.c @@ -146,22 +146,21 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, bvprvp = &bvprv; sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9; - if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) - front_seg_size = seg_size; continue; } new_segment: if (nsegs == queue_max_segments(q)) goto split; + if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) + front_seg_size = seg_size; + nsegs++; bvprv = bv; bvprvp = &bvprv; seg_size = bv.bv_len; sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9; - if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) - front_seg_size = seg_size; } do_split = false; @@ -174,6 +173,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q, bio = new; } + if (nsegs == 1 && seg_size > front_seg_size) + front_seg_size = seg_size; bio->bi_seg_front_size = front_seg_size; if (seg_size > bio->bi_seg_back_size) bio->bi_seg_back_size = seg_size;