From patchwork Fri May 18 10:18:04 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kent Overstreet X-Patchwork-Id: 10409405 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB69A602C2 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5C727FB3 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 9018928179; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:18:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695DC27FB3 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 10:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752518AbeERKSL (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 06:18:11 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com ([209.85.216.194]:35734 "EHLO mail-qt0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752479AbeERKSJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 06:18:09 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f194.google.com with SMTP id f5-v6so9567862qth.2; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:18:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=144kVoHHB9AbVNi8IVzACi+smUidq1XijOMBAhhOCzc=; b=WapBPdb5Sq6WiqJCYyexOTW2bQAZlVBFPFg9gGs0u82LnHE4apjVIiBBrbx9cY1mhk Hkam7e3q20G5+I2xEIqDafL/s8SersV5L5LvLLeX7C907MY4UF5t67pm1/OSpS8uWHeN TgQs179gEkVazB4v81HFRlpHTdA6FcS2yx5MCsSd1wd6ugWTr1h2oZQ9PCfKWVq5PQwi 9UFRebFxiNG8Mg2UJ/159OFN6xzpQQtfhMKS3BE4u5AegcwfLZ6FcX3NLCIk87ISpQ30 kD71cx4wpowlt3Xy8KtX6KiyYYbbkQifGVGUUJN/SfvUZe/eh+4A7OjFjzGRiuAR3Qrn Ioig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=144kVoHHB9AbVNi8IVzACi+smUidq1XijOMBAhhOCzc=; b=NGveieUJw3dHEao+/eXkBakl92rs17ux6XuxK+wvLfOR7eCgZwYbtZnoFuljjPB9So RDWsEGADeROto0eAfIAkVOmuqeptTOYqMqpBMYfSPirp5idwEXkvWpXEl+KQyeihDvgv jfHsKCdug760/jTOorEcoVHf29HWLIdmWA1hMQLWYskdYnddQPNm6Jew5CL3HoPD5rc5 sNopjF44zapTSS1HnyDjhrodY6vhHwl/aJF8K/t35hZFUJpbGI42hmol9o7Crl6t9gIy dp3dOFsKu3OcC7pgEZNA/2OyaeQxeZjhB416eeEhfRQiApgKJke0+7Cxj0oY6OIve+Fo KBRw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwed3rm+12M8rdRkipiDHBdDZ4Cu7U1ewkpmnXZQuFdrdNWFJM3s y+1yik0u/qIRRnhSsqMGnQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq/jx+ipp0Ysi2mnk8UWaZsANnNev4QQoFquJpAzmOU3qkHz/3KwMEpbc4P4DPM2elDAWyt0Q== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3e45:: with SMTP id m5-v6mr8179161qtf.175.1526638688622; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kmo-pixel (c-71-234-172-214.hsd1.vt.comcast.net. [71.234.172.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z64-v6sm5276110qke.66.2018.05.18.03.18.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 May 2018 03:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 06:18:04 -0400 From: Kent Overstreet To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Dave Chinner , darrick.wong@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, willy@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] locking: export osq_lock()/osq_unlock() Message-ID: <20180518101804.GB15403@kmo-pixel> References: <20180518074918.13816-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20180518074918.13816-9-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20180518095204.GF12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180518095204.GF12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:52:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:49:06AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > No.. and most certainly not without a _very_ good reason. Ok, can I ask why? Here's what it's for: commit 61782bf71eef83919af100a9747d8d86dfdf3605 Author: Kent Overstreet Date: Fri May 18 06:14:56 2018 -0400 bcachefs: SIX locks (shared/intent/exclusive) New lock for bcachefs, like read/write locks but with a third state, intent. Intent locks conflict with each other, but not with read locks; taking a write lock requires first holding an intent lock. diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/six.c b/fs/bcachefs/six.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..afa59a476a --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/bcachefs/six.c @@ -0,0 +1,516 @@ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "six.h" + +#define six_acquire(l, t) lock_acquire(l, 0, t, 0, 0, NULL, _RET_IP_) +#define six_release(l) lock_release(l, 0, _RET_IP_) + +struct six_lock_vals { + /* Value we add to the lock in order to take the lock: */ + u64 lock_val; + + /* If the lock has this value (used as a mask), taking the lock fails: */ + u64 lock_fail; + + /* Value we add to the lock in order to release the lock: */ + u64 unlock_val; + + /* Mask that indicates lock is held for this type: */ + u64 held_mask; + + /* Waitlist we wakeup when releasing the lock: */ + enum six_lock_type unlock_wakeup; +}; + +#define __SIX_LOCK_HELD_read __SIX_VAL(read_lock, ~0) +#define __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent __SIX_VAL(intent_lock, ~0) +#define __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write __SIX_VAL(seq, 1) + +#define LOCK_VALS { \ + [SIX_LOCK_read] = { \ + .lock_val = __SIX_VAL(read_lock, 1), \ + .lock_fail = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write, \ + .unlock_val = -__SIX_VAL(read_lock, 1), \ + .held_mask = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_read, \ + .unlock_wakeup = SIX_LOCK_write, \ + }, \ + [SIX_LOCK_intent] = { \ + .lock_val = __SIX_VAL(intent_lock, 1), \ + .lock_fail = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent, \ + .unlock_val = -__SIX_VAL(intent_lock, 1), \ + .held_mask = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent, \ + .unlock_wakeup = SIX_LOCK_intent, \ + }, \ + [SIX_LOCK_write] = { \ + .lock_val = __SIX_VAL(seq, 1), \ + .lock_fail = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_read, \ + .unlock_val = __SIX_VAL(seq, 1), \ + .held_mask = __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write, \ + .unlock_wakeup = SIX_LOCK_read, \ + }, \ +} + +static inline void six_set_owner(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type, + union six_lock_state old) +{ + if (type != SIX_LOCK_intent) + return; + + if (!old.intent_lock) { + EBUG_ON(lock->owner); + lock->owner = current; + } else { + EBUG_ON(lock->owner != current); + } +} + +static inline void six_clear_owner(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + if (type != SIX_LOCK_intent) + return; + + EBUG_ON(lock->owner != current); + + if (lock->state.intent_lock == 1) + lock->owner = NULL; +} + +static __always_inline bool do_six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, + enum six_lock_type type) +{ + const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS; + union six_lock_state old; + u64 v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v); + + EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write && lock->owner != current); + + do { + old.v = v; + + EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write && + ((old.v & __SIX_LOCK_HELD_write) || + !(old.v & __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent))); + + if (old.v & l[type].lock_fail) + return false; + } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter, + old.v, + old.v + l[type].lock_val)) != old.v); + + six_set_owner(lock, type, old); + return true; +} + +__always_inline __flatten +static bool __six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + if (!do_six_trylock_type(lock, type)) + return false; + + six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 1); + return true; +} + +__always_inline __flatten +static bool __six_relock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type, + unsigned seq) +{ + const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS; + union six_lock_state old; + u64 v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v); + + do { + old.v = v; + + if (old.seq != seq || old.v & l[type].lock_fail) + return false; + } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter, + old.v, + old.v + l[type].lock_val)) != old.v); + + six_set_owner(lock, type, old); + six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 1); + return true; +} + +struct six_lock_waiter { + struct list_head list; + struct task_struct *task; +}; + +/* This is probably up there with the more evil things I've done */ +#define waitlist_bitnr(id) ilog2((((union six_lock_state) { .waiters = 1 << (id) }).l)) + +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_SPIN_ON_OWNER + +static inline int six_can_spin_on_owner(struct six_lock *lock) +{ + struct task_struct *owner; + int retval = 1; + + if (need_resched()) + return 0; + + rcu_read_lock(); + owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner); + if (owner) + retval = owner->on_cpu; + rcu_read_unlock(); + /* + * if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired + * it and not set the owner yet or the mutex has been released. + */ + return retval; +} + +static inline bool six_spin_on_owner(struct six_lock *lock, + struct task_struct *owner) +{ + bool ret = true; + + rcu_read_lock(); + while (lock->owner == owner) { + /* + * Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_ + * checking lock->owner still matches owner. If that fails, + * owner might point to freed memory. If it still matches, + * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid. + */ + barrier(); + + if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched()) { + ret = false; + break; + } + + cpu_relax(); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return ret; +} + +static inline bool six_optimistic_spin(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + + if (type == SIX_LOCK_write) + return false; + + preempt_disable(); + if (!six_can_spin_on_owner(lock)) + goto fail; + + if (!osq_lock(&lock->osq)) + goto fail; + + while (1) { + struct task_struct *owner; + + /* + * If there's an owner, wait for it to either + * release the lock or go to sleep. + */ + owner = READ_ONCE(lock->owner); + if (owner && !six_spin_on_owner(lock, owner)) + break; + + if (do_six_trylock_type(lock, type)) { + osq_unlock(&lock->osq); + preempt_enable(); + return true; + } + + /* + * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the + * owner acquiring the lock and setting the owner field. If + * we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let + * the owner complete. + */ + if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(task))) + break; + + /* + * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces + * everything in this loop to be re-loaded. We don't need + * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right + * values at the cost of a few extra spins. + */ + cpu_relax(); + } + + osq_unlock(&lock->osq); +fail: + preempt_enable(); + + /* + * If we fell out of the spin path because of need_resched(), + * reschedule now, before we try-lock again. This avoids getting + * scheduled out right after we obtained the lock. + */ + if (need_resched()) + schedule(); + + return false; +} + +#else /* CONFIG_LOCK_SPIN_ON_OWNER */ + +static inline bool six_optimistic_spin(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + return false; +} + +#endif + +noinline +static void __six_lock_type_slowpath(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS; + union six_lock_state old, new; + struct six_lock_waiter wait; + u64 v; + + if (six_optimistic_spin(lock, type)) + return; + + lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_); + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wait.list); + wait.task = current; + + while (1) { + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + if (type == SIX_LOCK_write) + EBUG_ON(lock->owner != current); + else if (list_empty_careful(&wait.list)) { + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + list_add_tail(&wait.list, &lock->wait_list[type]); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + } + + v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v); + do { + new.v = old.v = v; + + if (!(old.v & l[type].lock_fail)) + new.v += l[type].lock_val; + else if (!(new.waiters & (1 << type))) + new.waiters |= 1 << type; + else + break; /* waiting bit already set */ + } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter, + old.v, new.v)) != old.v); + + if (!(old.v & l[type].lock_fail)) + break; + + schedule(); + } + + six_set_owner(lock, type, old); + + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + + if (!list_empty_careful(&wait.list)) { + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + list_del_init(&wait.list); + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + } +} + +__always_inline +static void __six_lock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0); + + if (!do_six_trylock_type(lock, type)) + __six_lock_type_slowpath(lock, type); + + lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_); +} + +static inline void six_lock_wakeup(struct six_lock *lock, + union six_lock_state state, + unsigned waitlist_id) +{ + struct list_head *wait_list = &lock->wait_list[waitlist_id]; + struct six_lock_waiter *w, *next; + + if (waitlist_id == SIX_LOCK_write && state.read_lock) + return; + + if (!(state.waiters & (1 << waitlist_id))) + return; + + clear_bit(waitlist_bitnr(waitlist_id), + (unsigned long *) &lock->state.v); + + if (waitlist_id == SIX_LOCK_write) { + struct task_struct *p = READ_ONCE(lock->owner); + + if (p) + wake_up_process(p); + return; + } + + raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(w, next, wait_list, list) { + list_del_init(&w->list); + + if (wake_up_process(w->task) && + waitlist_id != SIX_LOCK_read) { + if (!list_empty(wait_list)) + set_bit(waitlist_bitnr(waitlist_id), + (unsigned long *) &lock->state.v); + break; + } + } + + raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); +} + +__always_inline __flatten +static void __six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS; + union six_lock_state state; + + EBUG_ON(!(lock->state.v & l[type].held_mask)); + EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write && + !(lock->state.v & __SIX_LOCK_HELD_intent)); + + six_clear_owner(lock, type); + + state.v = atomic64_add_return_release(l[type].unlock_val, + &lock->state.counter); + six_release(&lock->dep_map); + six_lock_wakeup(lock, state, l[type].unlock_wakeup); +} + +#ifdef SIX_LOCK_SEPARATE_LOCKFNS + +#define __SIX_LOCK(type) \ +bool six_trylock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \ +{ \ + return __six_trylock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \ +} \ + \ +bool six_relock_##type(struct six_lock *lock, u32 seq) \ +{ \ + return __six_relock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type, seq); \ +} \ + \ +void six_lock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \ +{ \ + __six_lock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \ +} \ + \ +void six_unlock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \ +{ \ + __six_unlock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \ +} + +__SIX_LOCK(read) +__SIX_LOCK(intent) +__SIX_LOCK(write) + +#undef __SIX_LOCK + +#else + +bool six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + return __six_trylock_type(lock, type); +} + +bool six_relock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type, + unsigned seq) +{ + return __six_relock_type(lock, type, seq); + +} + +void six_lock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + __six_lock_type(lock, type); +} + +void six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + __six_unlock_type(lock, type); +} + +#endif + +/* Convert from intent to read: */ +void six_lock_downgrade(struct six_lock *lock) +{ + six_lock_increment(lock, SIX_LOCK_read); + six_unlock_intent(lock); +} + +bool six_lock_tryupgrade(struct six_lock *lock) +{ + const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS; + union six_lock_state old, new; + u64 v = READ_ONCE(lock->state.v); + + do { + new.v = old.v = v; + + EBUG_ON(!(old.v & l[SIX_LOCK_read].held_mask)); + + new.v += l[SIX_LOCK_read].unlock_val; + + if (new.v & l[SIX_LOCK_intent].lock_fail) + return false; + + new.v += l[SIX_LOCK_intent].lock_val; + } while ((v = atomic64_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->state.counter, + old.v, new.v)) != old.v); + + six_set_owner(lock, SIX_LOCK_intent, old); + six_lock_wakeup(lock, new, l[SIX_LOCK_read].unlock_wakeup); + + return true; +} + +bool six_trylock_convert(struct six_lock *lock, + enum six_lock_type from, + enum six_lock_type to) +{ + EBUG_ON(to == SIX_LOCK_write || from == SIX_LOCK_write); + + if (to == from) + return true; + + if (to == SIX_LOCK_read) { + six_lock_downgrade(lock); + return true; + } else { + return six_lock_tryupgrade(lock); + } +} + +/* + * Increment read/intent lock count, assuming we already have it read or intent + * locked: + */ +void six_lock_increment(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + const struct six_lock_vals l[] = LOCK_VALS; + + EBUG_ON(type == SIX_LOCK_write); + six_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0); + + /* XXX: assert already locked, and that we don't overflow: */ + + atomic64_add(l[type].lock_val, &lock->state.counter); +} diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/six.h b/fs/bcachefs/six.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f518c64c40 --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/bcachefs/six.h @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ +#ifndef _BCACHEFS_SIX_H +#define _BCACHEFS_SIX_H + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "util.h" + +#define SIX_LOCK_SEPARATE_LOCKFNS + +/* + * LOCK STATES: + * + * read, intent, write (i.e. shared/intent/exclusive, hence the name) + * + * read and write work as with normal read/write locks - a lock can have + * multiple readers, but write excludes reads and other write locks. + * + * Intent does not block read, but it does block other intent locks. The idea is + * by taking an intent lock, you can then later upgrade to a write lock without + * dropping your read lock and without deadlocking - because no other thread has + * the intent lock and thus no other thread could be trying to take the write + * lock. + */ + +union six_lock_state { + struct { + atomic64_t counter; + }; + + struct { + u64 v; + }; + + struct { + /* for waitlist_bitnr() */ + unsigned long l; + }; + + struct { + unsigned read_lock:26; + unsigned intent_lock:3; + unsigned waiters:3; + /* + * seq works much like in seqlocks: it's incremented every time + * we lock and unlock for write. + * + * If it's odd write lock is held, even unlocked. + * + * Thus readers can unlock, and then lock again later iff it + * hasn't been modified in the meantime. + */ + u32 seq; + }; +}; + +#define SIX_LOCK_MAX_RECURSE ((1 << 3) - 1) + +enum six_lock_type { + SIX_LOCK_read, + SIX_LOCK_intent, + SIX_LOCK_write, +}; + +struct six_lock { + union six_lock_state state; + struct task_struct *owner; + struct optimistic_spin_queue osq; + + raw_spinlock_t wait_lock; + struct list_head wait_list[2]; +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC + struct lockdep_map dep_map; +#endif +}; + +static __always_inline void __six_lock_init(struct six_lock *lock, + const char *name, + struct lock_class_key *key) +{ + atomic64_set(&lock->state.counter, 0); + raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list[SIX_LOCK_read]); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list[SIX_LOCK_intent]); +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC + debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *) lock, sizeof(*lock)); + lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0); +#endif +} + +#define six_lock_init(lock) \ +do { \ + static struct lock_class_key __key; \ + \ + __six_lock_init((lock), #lock, &__key); \ +} while (0) + +#define __SIX_VAL(field, _v) (((union six_lock_state) { .field = _v }).v) + +#ifdef SIX_LOCK_SEPARATE_LOCKFNS + +#define __SIX_LOCK(type) \ +bool six_trylock_##type(struct six_lock *); \ +bool six_relock_##type(struct six_lock *, u32); \ +void six_lock_##type(struct six_lock *); \ +void six_unlock_##type(struct six_lock *); + +__SIX_LOCK(read) +__SIX_LOCK(intent) +__SIX_LOCK(write) +#undef __SIX_LOCK + +#define SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, fn, ...) \ + switch (type) { \ + case SIX_LOCK_read: \ + return fn##_read(__VA_ARGS__); \ + case SIX_LOCK_intent: \ + return fn##_intent(__VA_ARGS__); \ + case SIX_LOCK_write: \ + return fn##_write(__VA_ARGS__); \ + default: \ + BUG(); \ + } + +static inline bool six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_trylock, lock); +} + +static inline bool six_relock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type, + unsigned seq) +{ + SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_relock, lock, seq); +} + +static inline void six_lock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_lock, lock); +} + +static inline void six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *lock, enum six_lock_type type) +{ + SIX_LOCK_DISPATCH(type, six_unlock, lock); +} + +#else + +bool six_trylock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type); +bool six_relock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type, unsigned); +void six_lock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type); +void six_unlock_type(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type); + +#define __SIX_LOCK(type) \ +static __always_inline bool six_trylock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \ +{ \ + return six_trylock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \ +} \ + \ +static __always_inline bool six_relock_##type(struct six_lock *lock, u32 seq)\ +{ \ + return six_relock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type, seq); \ +} \ + \ +static __always_inline void six_lock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \ +{ \ + six_lock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \ +} \ + \ +static __always_inline void six_unlock_##type(struct six_lock *lock) \ +{ \ + six_unlock_type(lock, SIX_LOCK_##type); \ +} + +__SIX_LOCK(read) +__SIX_LOCK(intent) +__SIX_LOCK(write) +#undef __SIX_LOCK + +#endif + +void six_lock_downgrade(struct six_lock *); +bool six_lock_tryupgrade(struct six_lock *); +bool six_trylock_convert(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type, + enum six_lock_type); + +void six_lock_increment(struct six_lock *, enum six_lock_type); + +#endif /* _BCACHEFS_SIX_H */