From patchwork Tue Oct 30 13:18:05 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Carlos Maiolino X-Patchwork-Id: 10660885 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185001734 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12155295DC for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 069BF295E6; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EC0295DC for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728056AbeJ3WME (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:12:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22003 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727772AbeJ3WME (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:12:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF86881F0E; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odin.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.205.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B215DF50; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Carlos Maiolino To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com Subject: [PATCH 02/20] cachefiles: drop direct usage of ->bmap method. Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:18:05 +0100 Message-Id: <20181030131823.29040-3-cmaiolino@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181030131823.29040-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> References: <20181030131823.29040-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Replace the direct usage of ->bmap method by a bmap() call. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino --- fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c index 40f7595aad10..a3ee23fe9269 100644 --- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c +++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op, struct cachefiles_object *object; struct cachefiles_cache *cache; struct inode *inode; - sector_t block0, block; + sector_t block; unsigned shift; int ret; @@ -416,7 +416,6 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op, inode = d_backing_inode(object->backer); ASSERT(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)); - ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap); ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->readpages); /* calculate the shift required to use bmap */ @@ -432,12 +431,14 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op, * enough for this as it doesn't indicate errors, but it's all we've * got for the moment */ - block0 = page->index; - block0 <<= shift; + block = page->index; + block <<= shift; + + ret = bmap(inode, &block); + ASSERT(!ret); - block = inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap(inode->i_mapping, block0); _debug("%llx -> %llx", - (unsigned long long) block0, + (unsigned long long) (page->index << shift), (unsigned long long) block); if (block) { @@ -709,7 +710,6 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_pages(struct fscache_retrieval *op, inode = d_backing_inode(object->backer); ASSERT(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)); - ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap); ASSERT(inode->i_mapping->a_ops->readpages); /* calculate the shift required to use bmap */ @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_pages(struct fscache_retrieval *op, ret = space ? -ENODATA : -ENOBUFS; list_for_each_entry_safe(page, _n, pages, lru) { - sector_t block0, block; + sector_t block; /* we assume the absence or presence of the first block is a * good enough indication for the page as a whole @@ -734,13 +734,14 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_pages(struct fscache_retrieval *op, * good enough for this as it doesn't indicate errors, but * it's all we've got for the moment */ - block0 = page->index; - block0 <<= shift; + block = page->index; + block <<= shift; + + ret = bmap(inode, &block); + ASSERT(!ret); - block = inode->i_mapping->a_ops->bmap(inode->i_mapping, - block0); _debug("%llx -> %llx", - (unsigned long long) block0, + (unsigned long long) (page->index << shift), (unsigned long long) block); if (block) {