@@ -98,20 +98,22 @@ static bool check_layout_compatibility(struct super_block *sb,
static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct erofs_sb_info *sbi;
- struct buffer_head *bh;
+ struct page *page;
struct erofs_super_block *dsb;
unsigned int blkszbits;
+ void *data;
int ret;
- bh = sb_bread(sb, 0);
-
- if (!bh) {
+ page = read_mapping_page(sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 0, NULL);
+ if (!page) {
erofs_err(sb, "cannot read erofs superblock");
return -EIO;
}
sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
- dsb = (struct erofs_super_block *)(bh->b_data + EROFS_SUPER_OFFSET);
+
+ data = kmap_atomic(page);
+ dsb = (struct erofs_super_block *)(data + EROFS_SUPER_OFFSET);
ret = -EINVAL;
if (le32_to_cpu(dsb->magic) != EROFS_SUPER_MAGIC_V1) {
@@ -153,7 +155,8 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
}
ret = 0;
out:
- brelse(bh);
+ kunmap_atomic(data);
+ put_page(page);
return ret;
}
As Christoph said [1], "This seems to be your only direct use of buffer heads, which while not deprecated are a bit of an ugly step child. So if you can easily avoid creating a buffer_head dependency in a new filesystem I think you should avoid it. " [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/ Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> --- fs/erofs/super.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)