From patchwork Thu Apr 30 11:59:51 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Satya Tangirala X-Patchwork-Id: 11520037 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DBC1805 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030AE20838 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="j3MV8ehi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727070AbgD3MAM (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:00:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37322 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726942AbgD3MAK (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:00:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f4a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8FBC035494 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com with SMTP id q4so4651693qve.19 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=xb7ctfgBkT8MKaWibTzyhvK9qysU0rW7SMEIFQJPgjA=; b=j3MV8ehiEKFgagO26nEjNhVxO4Z3rfz3PgodR90MbmrOihzmftOVMN3dBSVjw6DwcH NwnboOih2ghd10oscPSB9TbkVyxMFmxTmRY9cfbQYPSStmlGMGHr4pXkNtCKksXqcReZ VmjTcKlNEs5zmmT5nzpxh8Q4oACZ2GFvoGqw5BcrCu7lRNJhLvd8n0p8WvM7/2zMhXRC MChmDritFxEmgy7hFU9O/trQyxIrq47yNSgUDXcWBXHbTrr6Hx7+nBsFawKzrqskLaa2 vz8ZbhrtwnNrqNVciVFxtHPWdZimvNauQchtfjH7114FebUU3UGoR8rZ65ov0YMMRTqZ cTTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=xb7ctfgBkT8MKaWibTzyhvK9qysU0rW7SMEIFQJPgjA=; b=XaiiniPrl4rpjb9eGRUyKqffGSMknJ61gPDahTbyzN4L6YohCqwT0VyrZPtGKqva9g Ll+rGFVlz82/oEGCkvPSq2j3xFgfABiqdDpIWPmNOEuPwE+0CkHid48Kf9Zb53ynx4dq yIN4rypnk0YdaXivXfP6wgobf7ERPSAxmaaf2tyI+819AYWbaLjgJAyRirlloQ6oWJUr KYEIJCshMS6EHCTM48he5v7dJJwWZru+tmhlSBPuSREfGMVPUItTQ0m099pijLCahb1o CW+b2hoOucpyX48EcjLv0rxCwUttm5k12Eqt/pN1lxgqV7AnnRdDMa+jYE+a5FUae9Uo xmfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYwCpRoPsaRN+OZAh/54nwk79uMShJsOPWiHRkmjwGje5+s3Jfa RgzB2V2DzA4M3jwNrT8gM4dzipVeH6I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ0+JbtQIPsOVpdih60Wu/ehAdkUx4TBNQKmrynPl5SshZ274V1P85qpQJQSoRICJ+5d5v3BF8jgY8= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4f01:: with SMTP id fb1mr2711453qvb.162.1588248007896; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:59:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20200430115959.238073-1-satyat@google.com> Message-Id: <20200430115959.238073-5-satyat@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200430115959.238073-1-satyat@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2.303.gf8c07b1a785-goog Subject: [PATCH v12 04/12] block: Make blk-integrity preclude hardware inline encryption From: Satya Tangirala To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: Barani Muthukumaran , Kuohong Wang , Kim Boojin , Satya Tangirala Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Whenever a device supports blk-integrity, make the kernel pretend that the device doesn't support inline encryption (essentially by setting the keyslot manager in the request queue to NULL). There's no hardware currently that supports both integrity and inline encryption. However, it seems possible that there will be such hardware in the near future (like the NVMe key per I/O support that might support both inline encryption and PI). But properly integrating both features is not trivial, and without real hardware that implements both, it is difficult to tell if it will be done correctly by the majority of hardware that support both. So it seems best not to support both features together right now, and to decide what to do at probe time. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- block/bio-integrity.c | 3 +++ block/blk-integrity.c | 7 +++++++ block/keyslot-manager.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/blkdev.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c index bf62c25cde8f4..3579ac0f6ec1f 100644 --- a/block/bio-integrity.c +++ b/block/bio-integrity.c @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integrity_alloc(struct bio *bio, struct bio_set *bs = bio->bi_pool; unsigned inline_vecs; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_has_crypt_ctx(bio))) + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); + if (!bs || !mempool_initialized(&bs->bio_integrity_pool)) { bip = kmalloc(struct_size(bip, bip_inline_vecs, nr_vecs), gfp_mask); inline_vecs = nr_vecs; diff --git a/block/blk-integrity.c b/block/blk-integrity.c index ff1070edbb400..c03705cbb9c9f 100644 --- a/block/blk-integrity.c +++ b/block/blk-integrity.c @@ -409,6 +409,13 @@ void blk_integrity_register(struct gendisk *disk, struct blk_integrity *template bi->tag_size = template->tag_size; disk->queue->backing_dev_info->capabilities |= BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES; + +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION + if (disk->queue->ksm) { + pr_warn("blk-integrity: Integrity and hardware inline encryption are not supported together. Disabling hardware inline encryption.\n"); + blk_ksm_unregister(disk->queue); + } +#endif } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_integrity_register); diff --git a/block/keyslot-manager.c b/block/keyslot-manager.c index 69f51909fc8ad..8d388cdbcd5d0 100644 --- a/block/keyslot-manager.c +++ b/block/keyslot-manager.c @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ * Upper layers will call blk_ksm_get_slot_for_key() to program a * key into some slot in the inline encryption hardware. */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "blk-crypto: " fmt + #include #include #include @@ -376,3 +379,19 @@ void blk_ksm_destroy(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm) memzero_explicit(ksm, sizeof(*ksm)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_ksm_destroy); + +bool blk_ksm_register(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm, struct request_queue *q) +{ + if (blk_integrity_queue_supports_integrity(q)) { + pr_warn("Integrity and hardware inline encryption are not supported together. Disabling hardware inline encryption.\n"); + return false; + } + q->ksm = ksm; + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_ksm_register); + +void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q) +{ + q->ksm = NULL; +} diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h index 98aae4638fda9..17738dab8ae04 100644 --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h @@ -1562,6 +1562,12 @@ struct blk_integrity *bdev_get_integrity(struct block_device *bdev) return blk_get_integrity(bdev->bd_disk); } +static inline bool +blk_integrity_queue_supports_integrity(struct request_queue *q) +{ + return q->integrity.profile; +} + static inline bool blk_integrity_rq(struct request *rq) { return rq->cmd_flags & REQ_INTEGRITY; @@ -1642,6 +1648,11 @@ static inline struct blk_integrity *blk_get_integrity(struct gendisk *disk) { return NULL; } +static inline bool +blk_integrity_queue_supports_integrity(struct request_queue *q) +{ + return false; +} static inline int blk_integrity_compare(struct gendisk *a, struct gendisk *b) { return 0; @@ -1693,6 +1704,25 @@ static inline struct bio_vec *rq_integrity_vec(struct request *rq) #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */ +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION + +bool blk_ksm_register(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm, struct request_queue *q); + +void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q); + +#else /* CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION */ + +static inline bool blk_ksm_register(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm, + struct request_queue *q) +{ + return true; +} + +static inline void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q) { } + +#endif /* CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION */ + + struct block_device_operations { int (*open) (struct block_device *, fmode_t); void (*release) (struct gendisk *, fmode_t);