Message ID | 20210525172428.3634316-2-ira.weiny@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | DAX Small clean ups | expand |
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:26AM -0700, 'Ira Weiny' wrote: > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > fuse_dax_mem_range_init() does not need the address or the pfn of the > memory requested in dax_direct_access(). It is only calling direct > access to get the number of pages. In looking for feedback on this small series I realize that I failed to email Miklos for the fs/fuse patch. I'm adding Miklos to the To line... For the rest of the series is there any feedback? Ira > > Remove the unused variables and stop requesting the kaddr and pfn from > dax_direct_access(). > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > --- > fs/fuse/dax.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c > index ff99ab2a3c43..34f8a5635c7f 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c > @@ -1234,8 +1234,6 @@ void fuse_dax_conn_free(struct fuse_conn *fc) > static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) > { > long nr_pages, nr_ranges; > - void *kaddr; > - pfn_t pfn; > struct fuse_dax_mapping *range; > int ret, id; > size_t dax_size = -1; > @@ -1247,8 +1245,8 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fcd->free_work, fuse_dax_free_mem_worker); > > id = dax_read_lock(); > - nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), &kaddr, > - &pfn); > + nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), NULL, > + NULL); > dax_read_unlock(id); > if (nr_pages < 0) { > pr_debug("dax_direct_access() returned %ld\n", nr_pages); > -- > 2.28.0.rc0.12.gb6a658bd00c9 >
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 19:23, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:26AM -0700, 'Ira Weiny' wrote: > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > > > fuse_dax_mem_range_init() does not need the address or the pfn of the > > memory requested in dax_direct_access(). It is only calling direct > > access to get the number of pages. > > In looking for feedback on this small series I realize that I failed to email > Miklos for the fs/fuse patch. > > I'm adding Miklos to the To line... LGTM, but this is Vivek's code, so adding Cc. Thanks, Miklos > > For the rest of the series is there any feedback? > > Ira > > > > > Remove the unused variables and stop requesting the kaddr and pfn from > > dax_direct_access(). > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > --- > > fs/fuse/dax.c | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c > > index ff99ab2a3c43..34f8a5635c7f 100644 > > --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c > > @@ -1234,8 +1234,6 @@ void fuse_dax_conn_free(struct fuse_conn *fc) > > static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) > > { > > long nr_pages, nr_ranges; > > - void *kaddr; > > - pfn_t pfn; > > struct fuse_dax_mapping *range; > > int ret, id; > > size_t dax_size = -1; > > @@ -1247,8 +1245,8 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fcd->free_work, fuse_dax_free_mem_worker); > > > > id = dax_read_lock(); > > - nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), &kaddr, > > - &pfn); > > + nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), NULL, > > + NULL); > > dax_read_unlock(id); > > if (nr_pages < 0) { > > pr_debug("dax_direct_access() returned %ld\n", nr_pages); > > -- > > 2.28.0.rc0.12.gb6a658bd00c9 > >
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:01:39AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 19:23, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24:26AM -0700, 'Ira Weiny' wrote: > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > > > > > fuse_dax_mem_range_init() does not need the address or the pfn of the > > > memory requested in dax_direct_access(). It is only calling direct > > > access to get the number of pages. > > > > In looking for feedback on this small series I realize that I failed to email > > Miklos for the fs/fuse patch. > > > > I'm adding Miklos to the To line... > > LGTM, but this is Vivek's code, so adding Cc. > Looks good to me as well. We are not using pfn and kaddr in fuse_dax_mem_range_init(). Reviewed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Thanks Vivek > Thanks, > Miklos > > > > > > For the rest of the series is there any feedback? > > > > Ira > > > > > > > > Remove the unused variables and stop requesting the kaddr and pfn from > > > dax_direct_access(). > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > > --- > > > fs/fuse/dax.c | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c > > > index ff99ab2a3c43..34f8a5635c7f 100644 > > > --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c > > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c > > > @@ -1234,8 +1234,6 @@ void fuse_dax_conn_free(struct fuse_conn *fc) > > > static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) > > > { > > > long nr_pages, nr_ranges; > > > - void *kaddr; > > > - pfn_t pfn; > > > struct fuse_dax_mapping *range; > > > int ret, id; > > > size_t dax_size = -1; > > > @@ -1247,8 +1245,8 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) > > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fcd->free_work, fuse_dax_free_mem_worker); > > > > > > id = dax_read_lock(); > > > - nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), &kaddr, > > > - &pfn); > > > + nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), NULL, > > > + NULL); > > > dax_read_unlock(id); > > > if (nr_pages < 0) { > > > pr_debug("dax_direct_access() returned %ld\n", nr_pages); > > > -- > > > 2.28.0.rc0.12.gb6a658bd00c9 > > > >
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dax.c b/fs/fuse/dax.c index ff99ab2a3c43..34f8a5635c7f 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dax.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dax.c @@ -1234,8 +1234,6 @@ void fuse_dax_conn_free(struct fuse_conn *fc) static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) { long nr_pages, nr_ranges; - void *kaddr; - pfn_t pfn; struct fuse_dax_mapping *range; int ret, id; size_t dax_size = -1; @@ -1247,8 +1245,8 @@ static int fuse_dax_mem_range_init(struct fuse_conn_dax *fcd) INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fcd->free_work, fuse_dax_free_mem_worker); id = dax_read_lock(); - nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), &kaddr, - &pfn); + nr_pages = dax_direct_access(fcd->dev, 0, PHYS_PFN(dax_size), NULL, + NULL); dax_read_unlock(id); if (nr_pages < 0) { pr_debug("dax_direct_access() returned %ld\n", nr_pages);