@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
struct ucode_patch {
struct list_head plist;
void *data; /* Intel uses only this one */
+ unsigned int size;
u32 patch_id;
u16 equiv_cpu;
};
@@ -788,6 +788,7 @@ static int verify_and_add_patch(u8 family, u8 *fw, unsigned int leftover,
kfree(patch);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ patch->size = *patch_size;
mc_hdr = (struct microcode_header_amd *)(fw + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
proc_id = mc_hdr->processor_rev_id;
@@ -869,7 +870,7 @@ load_microcode_amd(bool save, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
return ret;
memset(amd_ucode_patch, 0, PATCH_MAX_SIZE);
- memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, ksize(p->data), PATCH_MAX_SIZE));
+ memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, p->size, PATCH_MAX_SIZE));
return ret;
}
In preparation for reducing the use of ksize(), record the actual allocation size for later memcpy(). This avoids copying extra (uninitialized!) bytes into the patch buffer when the requested allocation size isn't exactly the size of a kmalloc bucket. Additionally fixes potential future issues where runtime bounds checking will notice that the buffer was allocated to a smaller value than returned by ksize(). Suggested-by: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+DvKQ+bp7Y7gmaVhacjv9uF6Ar-o4tet872h4Q8RPYPJjcJQA@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 757885e94a22 ("x86, microcode, amd: Early microcode patch loading support for AMD") Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)