diff mbox series

fs/ext2: Replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page()

Message ID 20221231174205.8492-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series fs/ext2: Replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page() | expand

Commit Message

Fabio M. De Francesco Dec. 31, 2022, 5:42 p.m. UTC
kmap_atomic() is deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page(). Therefore,
replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page().

kmap_atomic() is implemented like a kmap_local_page() which also disables
page-faults and preemption (the latter only for !PREEMPT_RT kernels).

However, the code within the mapping and un-mapping in ext2_make_empty()
does not depend on the above-mentioned side effects.

Therefore, a mere replacement of the old API with the new one is all it
is required (i.e., there is no need to explicitly add any calls to
pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable()).

Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
---

I tried my best to understand the code within mapping and un-mapping.
However, I'm not an expert. Therefore, although I'm pretty confident, I
cannot be 100% sure that the code between the mapping and the un-mapping
does not depend on pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable().

Unfortunately, I cannot currently test this changes to check the
above-mentioned assumptions. However, if I'm required to do the tests
with (x)fstests, I have no problems with doing them in the next days.

If so, I'll test in a QEMU/KVM x86_32 VM, 6GB RAM, booting a kernel with
HIGHMEM64GB enabled.

I'd like to hear whether or not the maintainers require these tests
and/or other tests.

 fs/ext2/dir.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jan Kara Jan. 2, 2023, 12:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat 31-12-22 18:42:05, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> kmap_atomic() is deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page(). Therefore,
> replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page().
> 
> kmap_atomic() is implemented like a kmap_local_page() which also disables
> page-faults and preemption (the latter only for !PREEMPT_RT kernels).
> 
> However, the code within the mapping and un-mapping in ext2_make_empty()
> does not depend on the above-mentioned side effects.
> 
> Therefore, a mere replacement of the old API with the new one is all it
> is required (i.e., there is no need to explicitly add any calls to
> pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable()).
> 
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>

Thanks, the patch looks good and I'll queue it in my tree. I'm not sure why
it got missed during the initial conversion by Ira :).

								Honza


> ---
> 
> I tried my best to understand the code within mapping and un-mapping.
> However, I'm not an expert. Therefore, although I'm pretty confident, I
> cannot be 100% sure that the code between the mapping and the un-mapping
> does not depend on pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable().
> 
> Unfortunately, I cannot currently test this changes to check the
> above-mentioned assumptions. However, if I'm required to do the tests
> with (x)fstests, I have no problems with doing them in the next days.
> 
> If so, I'll test in a QEMU/KVM x86_32 VM, 6GB RAM, booting a kernel with
> HIGHMEM64GB enabled.
> 
> I'd like to hear whether or not the maintainers require these tests
> and/or other tests.
> 
>  fs/ext2/dir.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c
> index e5cbc27ba459..0f144c5c7861 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c
> @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ int ext2_make_empty(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent)
>  		unlock_page(page);
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
> -	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> +	kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
>  	memset(kaddr, 0, chunk_size);
>  	de = (struct ext2_dir_entry_2 *)kaddr;
>  	de->name_len = 1;
> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ int ext2_make_empty(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent)
>  	de->inode = cpu_to_le32(parent->i_ino);
>  	memcpy (de->name, "..\0", 4);
>  	ext2_set_de_type (de, inode);
> -	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> +	kunmap_local(kaddr);
>  	ext2_commit_chunk(page, 0, chunk_size);
>  	err = ext2_handle_dirsync(inode);
>  fail:
> -- 
> 2.39.0
>
Ira Weiny Jan. 3, 2023, 4:20 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:34:11PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 31-12-22 18:42:05, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > kmap_atomic() is deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page(). Therefore,
> > replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page().
> > 
> > kmap_atomic() is implemented like a kmap_local_page() which also disables
> > page-faults and preemption (the latter only for !PREEMPT_RT kernels).
> > 
> > However, the code within the mapping and un-mapping in ext2_make_empty()
> > does not depend on the above-mentioned side effects.
> > 
> > Therefore, a mere replacement of the old API with the new one is all it
> > is required (i.e., there is no need to explicitly add any calls to
> > pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable()).
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> 
> Thanks, the patch looks good and I'll queue it in my tree. I'm not sure why
> it got missed during the initial conversion by Ira :).
> 

I could claim something smart like I was focused on kmap() calls only.  But
let's just call it laziness.  ;-)

LGTM

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

> 								Honza
> 
> 
> > ---
> > 
> > I tried my best to understand the code within mapping and un-mapping.
> > However, I'm not an expert. Therefore, although I'm pretty confident, I
> > cannot be 100% sure that the code between the mapping and the un-mapping
> > does not depend on pagefault_disable() and/or preempt_disable().
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I cannot currently test this changes to check the
> > above-mentioned assumptions. However, if I'm required to do the tests
> > with (x)fstests, I have no problems with doing them in the next days.
> > 
> > If so, I'll test in a QEMU/KVM x86_32 VM, 6GB RAM, booting a kernel with
> > HIGHMEM64GB enabled.
> > 
> > I'd like to hear whether or not the maintainers require these tests
> > and/or other tests.
> > 
> >  fs/ext2/dir.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c
> > index e5cbc27ba459..0f144c5c7861 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c
> > @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ int ext2_make_empty(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent)
> >  		unlock_page(page);
> >  		goto fail;
> >  	}
> > -	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> > +	kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
> >  	memset(kaddr, 0, chunk_size);
> >  	de = (struct ext2_dir_entry_2 *)kaddr;
> >  	de->name_len = 1;
> > @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ int ext2_make_empty(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent)
> >  	de->inode = cpu_to_le32(parent->i_ino);
> >  	memcpy (de->name, "..\0", 4);
> >  	ext2_set_de_type (de, inode);
> > -	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> > +	kunmap_local(kaddr);
> >  	ext2_commit_chunk(page, 0, chunk_size);
> >  	err = ext2_handle_dirsync(inode);
> >  fail:
> > -- 
> > 2.39.0
> > 
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c
index e5cbc27ba459..0f144c5c7861 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@  int ext2_make_empty(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent)
 		unlock_page(page);
 		goto fail;
 	}
-	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
+	kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
 	memset(kaddr, 0, chunk_size);
 	de = (struct ext2_dir_entry_2 *)kaddr;
 	de->name_len = 1;
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@  int ext2_make_empty(struct inode *inode, struct inode *parent)
 	de->inode = cpu_to_le32(parent->i_ino);
 	memcpy (de->name, "..\0", 4);
 	ext2_set_de_type (de, inode);
-	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
+	kunmap_local(kaddr);
 	ext2_commit_chunk(page, 0, chunk_size);
 	err = ext2_handle_dirsync(inode);
 fail: