diff mbox series

[4/4] fs/buffer: convert create_page_buffers to folio_create_buffers

Message ID 20230417123618.22094-5-p.raghav@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined, archived
Headers show
Series convert create_page_buffers to folio_create_buffers | expand

Commit Message

Pankaj Raghav April 17, 2023, 12:36 p.m. UTC 
fs/buffer do not support large folios as there are many assumptions on
the folio size to be the host page size. This conversion is one step
towards removing that assumption. Also this conversion will reduce calls
to compound_head() if folio_create_buffers() calls
folio_create_empty_buffers().

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
 fs/buffer.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Matthew Wilcox April 17, 2023, 1:37 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:36:18PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> fs/buffer do not support large folios as there are many assumptions on
> the folio size to be the host page size. This conversion is one step
> towards removing that assumption. Also this conversion will reduce calls
> to compound_head() if folio_create_buffers() calls
> folio_create_empty_buffers().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Hannes Reinecke April 17, 2023, 2:05 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 4/17/23 14:36, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> fs/buffer do not support large folios as there are many assumptions on
> the folio size to be the host page size. This conversion is one step
> towards removing that assumption. Also this conversion will reduce calls
> to compound_head() if folio_create_buffers() calls
> folio_create_empty_buffers().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> ---
>   fs/buffer.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 13724ef7eec7..a7fc561758b1 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1722,14 +1722,17 @@  static inline int block_size_bits(unsigned int blocksize)
 	return ilog2(blocksize);
 }
 
-static struct buffer_head *create_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct inode *inode, unsigned int b_state)
+static struct buffer_head *folio_create_buffers(struct folio *folio,
+						struct inode *inode,
+						unsigned int b_state)
 {
-	BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+	BUG_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio));
 
-	if (!page_has_buffers(page))
-		create_empty_buffers(page, 1 << READ_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits),
-				     b_state);
-	return page_buffers(page);
+	if (!folio_buffers(folio))
+		folio_create_empty_buffers(folio,
+					   1 << READ_ONCE(inode->i_blkbits),
+					   b_state);
+	return folio_buffers(folio);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1773,8 +1776,8 @@  int __block_write_full_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
 	int nr_underway = 0;
 	blk_opf_t write_flags = wbc_to_write_flags(wbc);
 
-	head = create_page_buffers(page, inode,
-					(1 << BH_Dirty)|(1 << BH_Uptodate));
+	head = folio_create_buffers(page_folio(page), inode,
+				    (1 << BH_Dirty) | (1 << BH_Uptodate));
 
 	/*
 	 * Be very careful.  We have no exclusion from block_dirty_folio
@@ -2037,7 +2040,7 @@  int __block_write_begin_int(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
 	BUG_ON(to > PAGE_SIZE);
 	BUG_ON(from > to);
 
-	head = create_page_buffers(&folio->page, inode, 0);
+	head = folio_create_buffers(folio, inode, 0);
 	blocksize = head->b_size;
 	bbits = block_size_bits(blocksize);
 
@@ -2323,7 +2326,7 @@  int block_read_full_folio(struct folio *folio, get_block_t *get_block)
 
 	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio), folio);
 
-	head = create_page_buffers(&folio->page, inode, 0);
+	head = folio_create_buffers(folio, inode, 0);
 	blocksize = head->b_size;
 	bbits = block_size_bits(blocksize);