Message ID | 20230530033239.17534-1-gouhao@uniontech.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fs/buffer: using __bio_add_page in submit_bh_wbc() | expand |
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:32:39AM +0800, gouhao@uniontech.com wrote: > From: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com> > > In submit_bh_wbc(), bio is newly allocated, so it > does not need any merging logic. > > And using bio_add_page here will execute 'bio_flagged( > bio, BIO_CLONED)' and 'bio_full' twice, which is unnecessary. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230502101934.24901-5-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com/ You could send some Reviewed-by: tags to that patch series.
在 2023/5/30 11:39, Matthew Wilcox 写道: > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:32:39AM +0800, gouhao@uniontech.com wrote: >> From: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com> >> >> In submit_bh_wbc(), bio is newly allocated, so it >> does not need any merging logic. >> >> And using bio_add_page here will execute 'bio_flagged( >> bio, BIO_CLONED)' and 'bio_full' twice, which is unnecessary. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230502101934.24901-5-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com/ > > You could send some Reviewed-by: tags to that patch series. > Ok, I didn't notice this patchset, thank you for your review.
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c index a7fc561758b1..5abc26d8399d 100644 --- a/fs/buffer.c +++ b/fs/buffer.c @@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ static void submit_bh_wbc(blk_opf_t opf, struct buffer_head *bh, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9); - bio_add_page(bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh)); + __bio_add_page(bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh)); BUG_ON(bio->bi_iter.bi_size != bh->b_size); bio->bi_end_io = end_bio_bh_io_sync;