From patchwork Tue Aug 22 13:57:07 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Brown X-Patchwork-Id: 13360974 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0EBEE49A4 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236660AbjHVOIm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2023 10:08:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34954 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236570AbjHVOIZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2023 10:08:25 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA91210C2; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 07:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6737165779; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6B23C433CC; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:06:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692713200; bh=IP7maWyjZ0dh+q8gDfrxLaUB03tkGEoqGc+9eYXpRWY=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=oGhOPTxrLq1eKbVQKPaxgctNFLZqJGTIu1jYpH5/KlUWfbHvzUF5qGKSCXOz+e+HK 8q1pBeWvRtSjYsjKGz1CRNBdHgXEwEoyW3e/JtAU1dTn99DFmooTQeI5RMAo02Bdke XDJdb/ojMFNU3FgSmhC8MsEcmznxpvNjj4zzP4fPhFJrbMgtju6z+X+QyI1fqaYw2D IkvnBZAlTvxtQo+o0GubdqPx1wmVffRrvaXxWPf3OPtFo+JuHz3jFtBiSJTxs2Grcx 0PJxqRRszQ99gX04GKzmwsA84WOuC8aPeF6A1yD6rjz8NofdDQrPT/PYL1MoY8pDWu l9oi7emfqpKBg== From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:57:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 34/37] kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for GCS mode locking MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20230822-arm64-gcs-v5-34-9ef181dd6324@kernel.org> References: <20230822-arm64-gcs-v5-0-9ef181dd6324@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230822-arm64-gcs-v5-0-9ef181dd6324@kernel.org> To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Arnd Bergmann , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Shuah Khan , "Rick P. Edgecombe" , Deepak Gupta , Ard Biesheuvel , Szabolcs Nagy Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.13-dev-034f2 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=7316; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=IP7maWyjZ0dh+q8gDfrxLaUB03tkGEoqGc+9eYXpRWY=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBk5MAKy+iQ2AZOug6MVquBG2PZF6HCUevMpNKDceOj 8g+uWMeJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCZOTACgAKCRAk1otyXVSH0O5pB/ 45roDlHDGyifEjEoVf2q2HEV20cf7DMj66U8sfuA1zNrPGlrcKbDjwUMN9ygb39pTSUmlv2492Je7p QHEu6L3IVzIFPQR0LkcgMv+gDiwZsOCRMVYdWJ0/pqTtKskyhk8mOUO4plpEma5fI7HeU+LEQj8ET5 XoOEAUS8BSSAEemgkLzBaF1utQHH8P9f//2RLUrVBe7bv2xP/dI2t87s48VBUC0RPN3/24E1aTABl9 8rGGU5dCq/U2iY2ht811cvi3awSNPKPSwjXd0rbNng3Q26b0gEyujWQqgXqgEYTZypudWhW1frLjU6 m2Xtp9BNOT9qPLwYBjFQ/o0CmMDygb X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Verify that we can lock individual GCS mode bits, that other modes aren't affected and as a side effect also that every combination of modes can be enabled. Normally the inability to reenable GCS after disabling it would be an issue with testing but fortunately the kselftest_harness runs each test within a fork()ed child. This can be inconvenient for some kinds of testing but here it means that each test is in a separate thread and therefore won't be affected by other tests in the suite. Once we get toolchains with support for enabling GCS by default we will need to take care to not do that in the build system but there are no such toolchains yet so it is not yet an issue. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore index 5810c4a163d4..0c86f53f68ad 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/.gitignore @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ basic-gcs libc-gcs +gcs-locking diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile index a8fdf21e9a47..2173d6275956 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/Makefile @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ # nolibc. # -TEST_GEN_PROGS := basic-gcs libc-gcs +TEST_GEN_PROGS := basic-gcs libc-gcs gcs-locking LDLIBS+=-lpthread diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f6a73254317e --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Limited. + * + * Tests for GCS mode locking. These tests rely on both having GCS + * unconfigured on entry and on the kselftest harness running each + * test in a fork()ed process which will have it's own mode. + */ + +#include + +#include +#include + +#include + +#include "kselftest_harness.h" + +#include "gcs-util.h" + +#define my_syscall2(num, arg1, arg2) \ +({ \ + register long _num __asm__ ("x8") = (num); \ + register long _arg1 __asm__ ("x0") = (long)(arg1); \ + register long _arg2 __asm__ ("x1") = (long)(arg2); \ + register long _arg3 __asm__ ("x2") = 0; \ + register long _arg4 __asm__ ("x3") = 0; \ + register long _arg5 __asm__ ("x4") = 0; \ + \ + __asm__ volatile ( \ + "svc #0\n" \ + : "=r"(_arg1) \ + : "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2), \ + "r"(_arg3), "r"(_arg4), \ + "r"(_arg5), "r"(_num) \ + : "memory", "cc" \ + ); \ + _arg1; \ +}) + +/* No mode bits are rejected for locking */ +TEST(lock_all_modes) +{ + int ret; + + ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, ULONG_MAX, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); +} + +FIXTURE(valid_modes) +{ +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT(valid_modes) +{ + unsigned long mode; +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable) +{ + .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE, +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable_write) +{ + .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE | PR_SHADOW_STACK_WRITE, +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable_push) +{ + .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE | PR_SHADOW_STACK_PUSH, +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(valid_modes, enable_write_push) +{ + .mode = PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE | PR_SHADOW_STACK_WRITE | + PR_SHADOW_STACK_PUSH, +}; + +FIXTURE_SETUP(valid_modes) +{ +} + +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(valid_modes) +{ +} + +/* We can set the mode at all */ +TEST_F(valid_modes, set) +{ + int ret; + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, + variant->mode); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + _exit(0); +} + +/* Enabling, locking then disabling is rejected */ +TEST_F(valid_modes, enable_lock_disable) +{ + unsigned long mode; + int ret; + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, + variant->mode); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(mode, variant->mode); + + ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EBUSY); + + _exit(0); +} + +/* Locking then enabling is rejected */ +TEST_F(valid_modes, lock_enable) +{ + unsigned long mode; + int ret; + + ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, + variant->mode); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EBUSY); + + ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(mode, 0); + + _exit(0); +} + +/* Locking then changing other modes is fine */ +TEST_F(valid_modes, lock_enable_disable_others) +{ + unsigned long mode; + int ret; + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, + variant->mode); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(mode, variant->mode); + + ret = prctl(PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, + PR_SHADOW_STACK_ALL_MODES); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(mode, PR_SHADOW_STACK_ALL_MODES); + + + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, + variant->mode); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(mode, variant->mode); + + _exit(0); +} + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + unsigned long mode; + int ret; + + if (!(getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_GCS)) + ksft_exit_skip("SKIP GCS not supported\n"); + + ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); + if (ret) { + ksft_print_msg("Failed to read GCS state: %d\n", ret); + return EXIT_FAILURE; + } + + if (mode & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) { + ksft_print_msg("GCS was enabled, test unsupported\n"); + return KSFT_SKIP; + } + + return test_harness_run(argc, argv); +}