From patchwork Thu Apr 25 11:37:40 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Pankaj Raghav \\(Samsung\\)" X-Patchwork-Id: 13643205 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC82212AAD1; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714045637; cv=none; b=QoYHLFSur2WAnwTSz074F/3lxdBLraAK5ugwNjnyxK+SHrtcS+qkbBfRHZv5nfDxRmjJFnAM/MIoLXZB/BrAIlYjo8IcPr5DUgDIKulnJW/LHoUOcf6nCO2y8YyWOPnmHa0J95xluN8OOMvq5iUMT1BWOyv22fokLbAKJvR+dp0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714045637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kwE4kRA1hN9mlG3PCM2KBf+7t4fXGBB1vmxwnpdjqlU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=DxyOLozbBEQSuOysrhk764p74i0OcexzJ5XTjR1CSqE1DI5OhGvQUfH6w8LBYQwOzodvx24gwhj1xsCPuWe0cb8dTIfJbnoJJ8G4W5ROFOdMlPvRna3eolpOAItSkNrSNhe4+fXIywYmO5ghLOxgO3Y03BMBTPS8jca/vnLnGTM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pankajraghav.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pankajraghav.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pankajraghav.com header.i=@pankajraghav.com header.b=Z0huUBl7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pankajraghav.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pankajraghav.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pankajraghav.com header.i=@pankajraghav.com header.b="Z0huUBl7" Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VQDPZ0yvLz9ssM; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:38:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pankajraghav.com; s=MBO0001; t=1714045090; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4fVr4b9yY0BnR40etXyUF6I1OzhNW3adroiSkIr7JfI=; b=Z0huUBl7vPYkwQXuGJvayILrp8fqw1XoWWWGfZA54Jz3eGBIbjPv2tzkb8U2hzLbN9kbzH CBVqCH1M87ltsgLZgkAJDtRtQTRwDdciiRm8HxJazZR48lp0lxZ0HZ8xH80ehB/Wf3AoJN KAh4mmedJIL72xLuMNS89gd6IW+Lksmwj+8MN4t+fBP+/YCC/PcX+i5CO1HDAW2CxtGWAG hdYShbikqRUAeOGRKvcwOevAF3K5a5ptRScXTkN4OOAADyrRpBA9eZ0HXPI8lSfNdVd5rm EGAr6TPGPpBEx6EBqTDWeGxgwBtvn53q1W5q5/KLLowSAgqffxK5VDdfhFhgcg== From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" To: willy@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, chandan.babu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com Subject: [PATCH v4 05/11] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:37:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20240425113746.335530-6-kernel@pankajraghav.com> In-Reply-To: <20240425113746.335530-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> References: <20240425113746.335530-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VQDPZ0yvLz9ssM From: Pankaj Raghav Splitting a larger folio with a base order is supported using split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() API. However, using that API for LBS is resulting in an NULL ptr dereference error in the writeback path [1]. Refuse to split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement until we can start using split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() API. Splitting the folio can be added as a later optimization. [1] https://gist.github.com/mcgrof/d12f586ec6ebe32b2472b5d634c397df Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain --- mm/huge_memory.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 9859aa4f7553..dadf1e68dbdc 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -3117,6 +3117,15 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list, goto out; } + /* + * Do not split if mapping has minimum folio order + * requirement. + */ + if (mapping_min_folio_order(mapping)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + gfp = current_gfp_context(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);