From patchwork Tue Aug 13 12:34:41 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhang Yi X-Patchwork-Id: 13761974 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6E3019B5A3; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723552768; cv=none; b=i+1UID7ytxqMDwsDN4PhDQA/YO5txSn3ujhVOtYvu/4p6OeaVxyi4DM2/aVLP25dIi8OS55S3whuwFbSqeY+mgNjolb8cuFvsuJfvn2+pGN75UIhqc517qZKChuiIgd87XHb5kQMXelweOXL/W7DJ4afkn0rm17HEb/V3YfE95I= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723552768; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cr2w19vsvXioQ1CZNfkvCUvEd0VWhBRx+9+DgpLtZl4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=izkQlRljnUcvlcysPsPLmuqKlzU2ihQr99YDohxn6viK7GNR0gvJKYUxa/PcdYjLkrLToTocnVav/o2A/G19oeYG7/yhHIJPJ4wBLnjGIyykJv2RLCH1revfhrDMH4aYeXbJLnHzkj3xFa/Yi4WMql1txP84HNi5e7p6eQ9Lgkk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WjrY23B7Kz4f3m7H; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:39:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAA81A0568; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:39:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgBnj4XkU7tmejNSBg--.17625S5; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:39:16 +0800 (CST) From: Zhang Yi To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v3 01/12] ext4: factor out ext4_map_create_blocks() to allocate new blocks Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:34:41 +0800 Message-Id: <20240813123452.2824659-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240813123452.2824659-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240813123452.2824659-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgBnj4XkU7tmejNSBg--.17625S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW3JryxKFWDZF4fZF45tr15CFg_yoW7KrWrpr WfCFyrGr4UWw1qgaySyr48XF1Yk3WYkrWUC3yfWryrZ345CrySyF15AFy3JFyDKrWxZw1Y qF4Fy348Ca95GrDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUm014x267AKxVW5JVWrJwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_Jr4l82xGYIkIc2 x26xkF7I0E14v26r4j6ryUM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0 Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJw A2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS 0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0 Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2 xKxwCY1x0262kKe7AKxVWUtVW8ZwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWU JVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67 kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY 6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0x vEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVj vjDU0xZFpf9x0JU2dgAUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: d1lo6xhdqjqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ From: Zhang Yi Factor out a common helper ext4_map_create_blocks() from ext4_map_blocks() to do a real blocks allocation, no logic changes. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 941c1c0d5c6e..112aec171ee9 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -482,6 +482,86 @@ static int ext4_map_query_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, return retval; } +static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, + struct ext4_map_blocks *map, int flags) +{ + struct extent_status es; + unsigned int status; + int err, retval = 0; + + /* + * Here we clear m_flags because after allocating an new extent, + * it will be set again. + */ + map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FLAGS; + + /* + * We need to check for EXT4 here because migrate could have + * changed the inode type in between. + */ + if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) { + retval = ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags); + } else { + retval = ext4_ind_map_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags); + + /* + * We allocated new blocks which will result in i_data's + * format changing. Force the migrate to fail by clearing + * migrate flags. + */ + if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW) + ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_EXT_MIGRATE); + } + if (retval <= 0) + return retval; + + if (unlikely(retval != map->m_len)) { + ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, + "ES len assertion failed for inode %lu: " + "retval %d != map->m_len %d", + inode->i_ino, retval, map->m_len); + WARN_ON(1); + } + + /* + * We have to zeroout blocks before inserting them into extent + * status tree. Otherwise someone could look them up there and + * use them before they are really zeroed. We also have to + * unmap metadata before zeroing as otherwise writeback can + * overwrite zeros with stale data from block device. + */ + if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO && + map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW) { + err = ext4_issue_zeroout(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_pblk, + map->m_len); + if (err) + return err; + } + + /* + * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update + * extent status tree. + */ + if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO && + ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) { + if (ext4_es_is_written(&es)) + return retval; + } + + status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ? + EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; + if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) && + !(status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN) && + ext4_es_scan_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, map->m_lblk, + map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1)) + status |= EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED; + + ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, + map->m_pblk, status); + + return retval; +} + /* * The ext4_map_blocks() function tries to look up the requested blocks, * and returns if the blocks are already mapped. @@ -630,12 +710,6 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN)) return retval; - /* - * Here we clear m_flags because after allocating an new extent, - * it will be set again. - */ - map->m_flags &= ~EXT4_MAP_FLAGS; - /* * New blocks allocate and/or writing to unwritten extent * will possibly result in updating i_data, so we take @@ -643,76 +717,7 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, * with create == 1 flag. */ down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem); - - /* - * We need to check for EXT4 here because migrate - * could have changed the inode type in between - */ - if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) { - retval = ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags); - } else { - retval = ext4_ind_map_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags); - - if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW) { - /* - * We allocated new blocks which will result in - * i_data's format changing. Force the migrate - * to fail by clearing migrate flags - */ - ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_EXT_MIGRATE); - } - } - - if (retval > 0) { - unsigned int status; - - if (unlikely(retval != map->m_len)) { - ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, - "ES len assertion failed for inode " - "%lu: retval %d != map->m_len %d", - inode->i_ino, retval, map->m_len); - WARN_ON(1); - } - - /* - * We have to zeroout blocks before inserting them into extent - * status tree. Otherwise someone could look them up there and - * use them before they are really zeroed. We also have to - * unmap metadata before zeroing as otherwise writeback can - * overwrite zeros with stale data from block device. - */ - if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO && - map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED && - map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_NEW) { - ret = ext4_issue_zeroout(inode, map->m_lblk, - map->m_pblk, map->m_len); - if (ret) { - retval = ret; - goto out_sem; - } - } - - /* - * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update - * extent status tree. - */ - if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO) && - ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) { - if (ext4_es_is_written(&es)) - goto out_sem; - } - status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ? - EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; - if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) && - !(status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN) && - ext4_es_scan_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, map->m_lblk, - map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1)) - status |= EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED; - ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, - map->m_pblk, status); - } - -out_sem: + retval = ext4_map_create_blocks(handle, inode, map, flags); up_write((&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem)); if (retval > 0 && map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED) { ret = check_block_validity(inode, map);