From patchwork Thu Aug 22 01:15:09 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mark Brown X-Patchwork-Id: 13772299 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992EE1CD02; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724289437; cv=none; b=bd7SuvPrhBLEVOqZpvnTYXXohnlvm2mN3ybNdY7ht1qJCNexKcTB9mGDz7Oy3568cE5CgrwICdzKeXWaR8mchbDG/dQ0ocs/zw+hLziYAxbWGx457L4AKXtfsw/FkixbBIL5GRmmrxsA6DPRTQ+5r8zdaVeRHTwdUsnCcf8wdLY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724289437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mwulGGogxj8ku3A/hMZCdLWowvWxbk7WDLoIzmIx3+8=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=I5Es91fk+iY1r3q25kNizwVJHWpX2f1YFB3p+89xIyOIPW/SWZfVnFc929A82arsXAjKfdAiADVMs8m79wmaEI2Tsq8cOEJdAmk1DMX5JuMpYVUZnhHg03pITH2wkPPikJ/DPFImiPFw2zZByK+E0Kea+nB2535s+/b5HW5oaRc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kUC07Y2K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kUC07Y2K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C874DC4AF1D; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 01:17:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724289437; bh=mwulGGogxj8ku3A/hMZCdLWowvWxbk7WDLoIzmIx3+8=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=kUC07Y2K22Ym1EUITTWjUQJsD5VfWiDwqqbjSe14iKVFX9oTVi9bmdd0EEMyEeEWv ++nWzFWeNrU8gWeSn5q1Y6ErYC4vS0IEIHZzVs0wlQN8/6+a8VX8oDAEittcMm4G/z X0DfPvMTmE4X6hyf4+d7w3sO0ezUSBuUBFl1icAtirc5UKhXZTUlVZ+reVMCr12SMf 3sAxgM/Y9RJLiYN9zlvQxaHLuZitexw/RO6Qbypog7vVzGxhh28JGpRRgMUEO4Gop7 8wmCojCwojsURXnevaXm/qBneDjjvVF+Z72tfchHEQgF0DLiy9LtRwtZQ2n7A9sRNW LvRcuPpv9mpDg== From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:15:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v11 06/39] arm64/gcs: Document the ABI for Guarded Control Stacks Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240822-arm64-gcs-v11-6-41b81947ecb5@kernel.org> References: <20240822-arm64-gcs-v11-0-41b81947ecb5@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240822-arm64-gcs-v11-0-41b81947ecb5@kernel.org> To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Arnd Bergmann , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Shuah Khan , "Rick P. Edgecombe" , Deepak Gupta , Ard Biesheuvel , Szabolcs Nagy , Kees Cook Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Florian Weimer , Christian Brauner , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Ross Burton , Yury Khrustalev , Wilco Dijkstra , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-37811 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=10552; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=mwulGGogxj8ku3A/hMZCdLWowvWxbk7WDLoIzmIx3+8=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBmxpEoFxv4vH0loPHT4FZLBGbLDkJa9nfl24z/8Car NYvnRtKJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCZsaRKAAKCRAk1otyXVSH0PiIB/ 0ZVtRL02jLNfgocstinEJGB75e8A4rko3MIfVQrHBdaONZeq23H9qFGjAYivLN4NjaNJMm+zS6Kw0U 7oALqscvj6FeKEnkXLgckocB+zeTPLqL7PmFhwvmqOnGfupXUvdHL60U2VfwEVFT7M4XC0Hs/+5oiD RDZc5wNd7pX9+qQvFOZqVlfJmOQsbaP4ziscLAYlU6HEZOZ9rDUDMavLpPFSyu/jSsUihObI3V6euz J4FLl1QO2ul5JdNxF1QDUk2sbmwpNXs1O8xav8d09rAAvdiWTtPfWOuSuvCJQAMtiT8bLbSbfsq4HO 1cxWfbPhKD2EhhIN2UbnOP7SB503Ja X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB Add some documentation of the userspace ABI for Guarded Control Stacks. Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas --- Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 231 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..421c953a0ffc --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/gcs.rst @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ +=============================================== +Guarded Control Stack support for AArch64 Linux +=============================================== + +This document outlines briefly the interface provided to userspace by Linux in +order to support use of the ARM Guarded Control Stack (GCS) feature. + +This is an outline of the most important features and issues only and not +intended to be exhaustive. + + + +1. General +----------- + +* GCS is an architecture feature intended to provide greater protection + against return oriented programming (ROP) attacks and to simplify the + implementation of features that need to collect stack traces such as + profiling. + +* When GCS is enabled a separate guarded control stack is maintained by the + PE which is writeable only through specific GCS operations. This + stores the call stack only, when a procedure call instruction is + performed the current PC is pushed onto the GCS and on RET the + address in the LR is verified against that on the top of the GCS. + +* When active the current GCS pointer is stored in the system register + GCSPR_EL0. This is readable by userspace but can only be updated + via specific GCS instructions. + +* The architecture provides instructions for switching between guarded + control stacks with checks to ensure that the new stack is a valid + target for switching. + +* The functionality of GCS is similar to that provided by the x86 Shadow + Stack feature, due to sharing of userspace interfaces the ABI refers to + shadow stacks rather than GCS. + +* Support for GCS is reported to userspace via HWCAP2_GCS in the aux vector + AT_HWCAP2 entry. + +* GCS is enabled per thread. While there is support for disabling GCS + at runtime this should be done with great care. + +* GCS memory access faults are reported as normal memory access faults. + +* GCS specific errors (those reported with EC 0x2d) will be reported as + SIGSEGV with a si_code of SEGV_CPERR (control protection error). + +* GCS is supported only for AArch64. + +* On systems where GCS is supported GCSPR_EL0 is always readable by EL0 + regardless of the GCS configuration for the thread. + +* The architecture supports enabling GCS without verifying that return values + in LR match those in the GCS, the LR will be ignored. This is not supported + by Linux. + + + +2. Enabling and disabling Guarded Control Stacks +------------------------------------------------- + +* GCS is enabled and disabled for a thread via the PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS + prctl(), this takes a single flags argument specifying which GCS features + should be used. + +* When set PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE flag allocates a Guarded Control Stack + and enables GCS for the thread, enabling the functionality controlled by + GCSCRE0_EL1.{nTR, RVCHKEN, PCRSEL}. + +* When set the PR_SHADOW_STACK_PUSH flag enables the functionality controlled + by GCSCRE0_EL1.PUSHMEn, allowing explicit GCS pushes. + +* When set the PR_SHADOW_STACK_WRITE flag enables the functionality controlled + by GCSCRE0_EL1.STREn, allowing explicit stores to the Guarded Control Stack. + +* Any unknown flags will cause PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS to return -EINVAL. + +* PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS is passed a bitmask of features with the same + values as used for PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. Any future changes to the + status of the specified GCS mode bits will be rejected. + +* PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS allows any bit to be locked, this allows + userspace to prevent changes to any future features. + +* There is no support for a process to remove a lock that has been set for + it. + +* PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS affect only the + thread that called them, any other running threads will be unaffected. + +* New threads inherit the GCS configuration of the thread that created them. + +* GCS is disabled on exec(). + +* The current GCS configuration for a thread may be read with the + PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS prctl(), this returns the same flags that + are passed to PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. + +* If GCS is disabled for a thread after having previously been enabled then + the stack will remain allocated for the lifetime of the thread. At present + any attempt to reenable GCS for the thread will be rejected, this may be + revisited in future. + +* It should be noted that since enabling GCS will result in GCS becoming + active immediately it is not normally possible to return from the function + that invoked the prctl() that enabled GCS. It is expected that the normal + usage will be that GCS is enabled very early in execution of a program. + + + +3. Allocation of Guarded Control Stacks +---------------------------------------- + +* When GCS is enabled for a thread a new Guarded Control Stack will be + allocated for it of half the standard stack size or 2 gigabytes, + whichever is smaller. + +* When a new thread is created by a thread which has GCS enabled then a + new Guarded Control Stack will be allocated for the new thread with + half the size of the standard stack. + +* When a stack is allocated by enabling GCS or during thread creation then + the top 8 bytes of the stack will be initialised to 0 and GCSPR_EL0 will + be set to point to the address of this 0 value, this can be used to + detect the top of the stack. + +* Additional Guarded Control Stacks can be allocated using the + map_shadow_stack() system call. + +* Stacks allocated using map_shadow_stack() can optionally have an end of + stack marker and cap placed at the top of the stack. If the flag + SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN is specified a cap will be placed on the stack, + if SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER is not specified the cap will be the top 8 + bytes of the stack and if it is specified then the cap will be the next + 8 bytes. While specifying just SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER by itself is + valid since the marker is all bits 0 it has no observable effect. + +* Stacks allocated using map_shadow_stack() must have a size which is a + multiple of 8 bytes larger than 8 bytes and must be 8 bytes aligned. + +* An address can be specified to map_shadow_stack(), if one is provided then + it must be aligned to a page boundary. + +* When a thread is freed the Guarded Control Stack initially allocated for + that thread will be freed. Note carefully that if the stack has been + switched this may not be the stack currently in use by the thread. + + +4. Signal handling +-------------------- + +* A new signal frame record gcs_context encodes the current GCS mode and + pointer for the interrupted context on signal delivery. This will always + be present on systems that support GCS. + +* The record contains a flag field which reports the current GCS configuration + for the interrupted context as PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS would. + +* The signal handler is run with the same GCS configuration as the interrupted + context. + +* When GCS is enabled for the interrupted thread a signal handling specific + GCS cap token will be written to the GCS, this is an architectural GCS cap + with the token type (bits 0..11) all clear. The GCSPR_EL0 reported in the + signal frame will point to this cap token. + +* The signal handler will use the same GCS as the interrupted context. + +* When GCS is enabled on signal entry a frame with the address of the signal + return handler will be pushed onto the GCS, allowing return from the signal + handler via RET as normal. This will not be reported in the gcs_context in + the signal frame. + + +5. Signal return +----------------- + +When returning from a signal handler: + +* If there is a gcs_context record in the signal frame then the GCS flags + and GCSPR_EL0 will be restored from that context prior to further + validation. + +* If there is no gcs_context record in the signal frame then the GCS + configuration will be unchanged. + +* If GCS is enabled on return from a signal handler then GCSPR_EL0 must + point to a valid GCS signal cap record, this will be popped from the + GCS prior to signal return. + +* If the GCS configuration is locked when returning from a signal then any + attempt to change the GCS configuration will be treated as an error. This + is true even if GCS was not enabled prior to signal entry. + +* GCS may be disabled via signal return but any attempt to enable GCS via + signal return will be rejected. + + +6. ptrace extensions +--------------------- + +* A new regset NT_ARM_GCS is defined for use with PTRACE_GETREGSET and + PTRACE_SETREGSET. + +* Due to the complexity surrounding allocation and deallocation of stacks and + lack of practical application it is not possible to enable GCS via ptrace. + GCS may be disabled via the ptrace interface. + +* Other GCS modes may be configured via ptrace. + +* Configuration via ptrace ignores locking of GCS mode bits. + + +7. ELF coredump extensions +--------------------------- + +* NT_ARM_GCS notes will be added to each coredump for each thread of the + dumped process. The contents will be equivalent to the data that would + have been read if a PTRACE_GETREGSET of the corresponding type were + executed for each thread when the coredump was generated. + + + +8. /proc extensions +-------------------- + +* Guarded Control Stack pages will include "ss" in their VmFlags in + /proc//smaps. diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst index 78544de0a8a9..056f6a739d25 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture cpu-feature-registers cpu-hotplug elf_hwcaps + gcs hugetlbpage kdump legacy_instructions