From patchwork Thu Nov 7 16:29:16 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 13865950 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9B018E756; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964623; cv=none; b=QLVmgDW4kIOt93U1/nEO/sRPTMVUmGJloihpPRPYQL28J+1ayZknKg/XqQh/ao1MwTN5bp+5R/sNlyvMTh7UxTvzLUu2TJ/ub+gaANpxVr7SOMaPENQqsGSmWmnfe7yIfxlItbhyMp+qP866ejImQ5OnTkxIGmB74c7Slijv/P8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964623; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SEq7DKLBNmA29ldzeeouDHYzH9koQTD4ZArvWUUL63Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=kDieMnSr33Gdq3oQRFwvvJiQDUnZwrdOdqqrfqmRaX1YulhyvHdNFFj28i/s0b1UyF0F/CwlpE9bdaN88GM40IWCBtmtdJhne8oYHT0WqC9zdW84ECs8lteJ3+5NnYeVz4Ts0ogrxceaEoStqzgQfMGfTU6YI4/wIkwdKReHlkQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XkYcd02qVz4f3jXw; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:29:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070451A0568; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.101.6]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S3; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:30:10 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] Xarray: Do not return sibling entries from xas_find_marked() Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:29:16 +0800 Message-Id: <20241107162920.208796-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7AFyrArW8Xr4rWF17uw1xKrg_yoW8KF15pF W8Ga40gF4xtr4jyry0yayUXayF9wn8XFWFyay8Gr1SyFnxJ3W0yr4jkryDtF9rZrW5Zw43 C3WFq345Za1DJw7anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBjb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGwA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Jrv_JF4l8cAvFVAK 0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4 x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l 84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I 8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AK xVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07js2-5UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ Similar to issue fixed in commit cbc02854331ed ("XArray: Do not return sibling entries from xa_load()"), we may return sibling entries from xas_find_marked as following: Thread A: Thread B: xa_store_range(xa, entry, 6, 7, gfp); xa_set_mark(xa, 6, mark) XA_STATE(xas, xa, 6); xas_find_marked(&xas, 7, mark); offset = xas_find_chunk(xas, advance, mark); [offset is 6 which points to a valid entry] xa_store_range(xa, entry, 4, 7, gfp); entry = xa_entry(xa, node, 6); [entry is a sibling of 4] if (!xa_is_node(entry)) return entry; Skip sibling entry like xas_find() does to protect caller from seeing sibling entry from xas_find_marked(). Besides, load_race() test is modified to catch mentioned issue and modified load_race() only passes after this fix is merged. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- lib/xarray.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index 32d4bac8c94c..fa87949719a0 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -1382,6 +1382,8 @@ void *xas_find_marked(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned long max, xa_mark_t mark) entry = xa_entry(xas->xa, xas->xa_node, xas->xa_offset); if (!entry && !(xa_track_free(xas->xa) && mark == XA_FREE_MARK)) continue; + if (xa_is_sibling(entry)) + continue; if (!xa_is_node(entry)) return entry; xas->xa_node = xa_to_node(entry); diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c index cffaf2245d4f..eaff1b036989 100644 --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static void *load_creator(void *ptr) unsigned long index = (3 << RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT) - (1 << order); item_insert_order(tree, index, order); + xa_set_mark(tree, index, XA_MARK_1); item_delete_rcu(tree, index); } } @@ -242,8 +243,11 @@ static void *load_worker(void *ptr) rcu_register_thread(); while (!stop_iteration) { + unsigned long find_index = (2 << RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT) + 1; struct item *item = xa_load(ptr, index); assert(!xa_is_internal(item)); + item = xa_find(ptr, &find_index, index, XA_MARK_1); + assert(!xa_is_internal(item)); } rcu_unregister_thread();