From patchwork Fri Nov 8 12:42:46 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Brian Foster X-Patchwork-Id: 13868127 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5681E882A for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731069680; cv=none; b=Nvk7yKs81s56fsLvfyQgaUQ1KNu9G4EQqRJA2R5lz81VnCwlYu7Ob1BEtS1A4YAtKW5QJTcuFIqn70+ai8j3lZxsiEo8ur4PsKdnraRuBlH49xqG9YIllV48XWwr2AlGym2r3H4hhBrbhmNFIwIdtGyfUy4tpCwy5lOGojlSUvM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731069680; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CZJi/OyUjBJ3Qns3n/1YgPbQWTEBPth83uDK/Wns008=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lMjwZN1e19rPqJkP5FS2IUA0OOe2EU84CYs4oZfv4rd5j1wmUf6z2DskBWNkeuRyyKiWEAK6iZrd3+tO7X39OXDkNVXv+ZH5JYD0qXRedYpgVY7rBhLeok3OG1uQFePbTzkM0zwy+A6TO2Ndg5+gYj01rGEcIJ9UlhZTffRC93c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=X5n42CSi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="X5n42CSi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731069677; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hdLf/MaIVZKlGy8e6e0n3R3u77Bw4zfNKRce7SSBUDw=; b=X5n42CSinbMfNj0PnWnebmnv/R0EP2Xtx4TDQsnXjaOlqnxsN6l9WLKxM9ll10ZEA0k/vZ D7lzVu6D6oiIa79DDu0F6O/bjBd5UwxydHStvd3EBvSBI9o41X6b6UahtQlE+tbl4GkmBE pGKIcHyfvabVdgVM1DZcfO7xYcxtPlU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-384-0UGv2EowMryeisKsJyHQTw-1; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 07:41:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 0UGv2EowMryeisKsJyHQTw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 0UGv2EowMryeisKsJyHQTw Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6292419560B0 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bfoster.redhat.com (unknown [10.22.64.111]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E024F1956054 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:41:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Brian Foster To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] iomap: warn on zero range of a post-eof folio Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 07:42:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20241108124246.198489-5-bfoster@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20241108124246.198489-1-bfoster@redhat.com> References: <20241108124246.198489-1-bfoster@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 iomap_zero_range() uses buffered writes for manual zeroing, no longer updates i_size for such writes, but is still explicitly called for post-eof ranges. The historical use case for this is zeroing post-eof speculative preallocation on extending writes from XFS. However, XFS also recently changed to convert all post-eof delalloc mappings to unwritten in the iomap_begin() handler, which means it now never expects manual zeroing of post-eof mappings. In other words, all post-eof mappings should be reported as holes or unwritten. This is a subtle dependency that can be hard to detect if violated because associated codepaths are likely to update i_size after folio locks are dropped, but before writeback happens to occur. For example, if XFS reverts back to some form of manual zeroing of post-eof blocks on write extension, writeback of those zeroed folios will now race with the presumed i_size update from the subsequent buffered write. Since iomap_zero_range() can't correctly zero post-eof mappings beyond EOF without updating i_size, warn if this ever occurs. This serves as minimal indication that if this use case is reintroduced by a filesystem, iomap_zero_range() might need to reconsider i_size updates for write extending use cases. Signed-off-by: Brian Foster --- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c index 7f40234a301e..e18830e4809b 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c @@ -1354,6 +1354,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero) { loff_t pos = iter->pos; loff_t length = iomap_length(iter); + loff_t isize = iter->inode->i_size; loff_t written = 0; do { @@ -1369,6 +1370,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero) if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE) break; + /* warn about zeroing folios beyond eof that won't write back */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_pos(folio) > isize); offset = offset_in_folio(folio, pos); if (bytes > folio_size(folio) - offset) bytes = folio_size(folio) - offset;