From patchwork Tue Dec 10 09:48:42 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bharata B Rao X-Patchwork-Id: 13901171 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12on2057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.243.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07AB522540B; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.243.57 ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733824149; cv=fail; b=b+fsHoxqDY2TCPve3XTt0+SzKWoqlyejxQcZdEqzFzKKWA4K0K82f0cBB78guq6e5ci+ZtZ5DJ18+zwSQ40uLh5GNiO7jp9RAeF7foMRmJh6z2+rE+XhToYqPDk0ML5PdYnqSsYvE4q/auxAfWU0cDaGuR0y3zaJAKBMnibGXnM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733824149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Txpd8WfU6smANj+UIs6BwcUM03ycB9MDqRLazTQnhLI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GuJSXCgkPVtiLLTRGmkhf3OzHH2W+eleT3TXDR1LD/tdmlteRGTkYBTs2TbJwj3LBbDE+FFo60lFnA2xcmEbSwNX1xgSLuBG0DJXtwt+Oo0RQCOmRKIbulmLkQFLZ62iDSqyA7O+4xJKu8thx72LpseH85AlvbRvyTd7Bm30mjs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b=etz1KsKZ; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.243.57 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b="etz1KsKZ" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FPBHn5E5NLEDx2M5mVhmeFCgEP8qW2i//elzXjTCBw0gVZPGz1EdpK367IvPpeT4iesCW6cBclqreZQbxUPvabn+uYTHVd+KpUm2P8BJ47VBuircoubpUoZXWrj3tB/IMG5ycnfgBGj4hCiHO55rLgdl7725oy+GbRb3YYz579rAkPR2xc7Lb/9uOaYFiaeYZ3H0rI2qtgn7/iMj7LgCJ4jpqbkZUJoUXr/WDxyn59O8xYnhUwGT9hoCq3YszIgu42Wii6AG2FQeXFktmCxoO7cIOMhNUAzW/ehGb3A0CsDwpTF3Hc531RFMMnSWoSERzJFslOGRAn8OZsTtEiOPqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=XaNMzxoG2eScPPvYOEWiCLCN/uTciIDbMbfl7KLstPQ=; b=ln0+1EdOrbhrtVpUTR39OHzF0FddqiF9liGI6ZtqxLhpp1i5+zy/8BNsvgqC0vWaRr926yz0klhguTOwtMI1oGxsFeLworDpqx+M4V3NO0LbEmH4aM919RTj2UPLaIoJpxoPfeuNZqwh2lVID8g+S3xnViVq+klwpS7d+lLUChQzDTx76/o85ljkwtFl1nvYCUcE/0ASRCNlhlxaHE1PFu7JUsPspvXb610Xn+8edyrAuMfU8p1Xb17CUWZRUu3Fyv4+WjprNAgrj8vzHMGK8lMPCdjyY0AG3hHmFs1+ry0M0SSfQAlfwschjNQ2YOeuI0eXLokiESY9C5knmZF68g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=kernel.dk smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=XaNMzxoG2eScPPvYOEWiCLCN/uTciIDbMbfl7KLstPQ=; b=etz1KsKZ4C/8YXM94B0RAg78iPizwPZEMZRvjEqRHj70F95ZYjHY+TKqlMALYGwBPj4AoMymrNDvChaaOvk+cgU0ulkIirPp3MCyvN/JivalShwLyqRzprd08bYVdS+FBOBtaYivxqH/oEbP2cHBAHOTGRWjqHf5lZ4Pa5cWYXE= Received: from BL1PR13CA0259.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2ba::24) by SA1PR12MB9492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:459::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8230.18; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:49:02 +0000 Received: from BL6PEPF00020E64.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2ba:cafe::40) by BL1PR13CA0259.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:208:2ba::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8251.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:49:01 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BL6PEPF00020E64.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.249.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.8230.7 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:49:01 +0000 Received: from BLR-L-BHARARAO.amd.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 03:48:58 -0600 From: Bharata B Rao To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCHSET v6 0/12] Uncached buffered IO Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:18:42 +0530 Message-ID: <20241210094842.204504-1-bharata@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241203153232.92224-2-axboe@kernel.dk> References: <20241203153232.92224-2-axboe@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BL6PEPF00020E64:EE_|SA1PR12MB9492:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 64000f0b-e162-4ebb-f0d0-08dd18ffe05b X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|1800799024|36860700013|376014|82310400026; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: =?utf-8?q?nwI+k1Ww+eDWNbXZ4IbVF/e8msM3ZCR?= =?utf-8?q?nfYx7VBpGNPtQeAGiOdEWdiqxgwaNcU5kyllzfjchuDmJq2LNAhh0aV2D2FIGGTMC?= =?utf-8?q?ODXlLB6OMCky659al5eRBOEjSTw0eiEJzRFD7MfFjSpgYorggQz7JUHtTiMYUoYL1?= =?utf-8?q?GCs5q3NTJCMbw466O+wIsNjkbYdJBeFqrmMW4kCAE+lEuJA+lzFlMAQwCkTdhIwex?= =?utf-8?q?F8hZB3Xme7YXn2RL/3nuivJcBWjn3eZgYyTmE6JxAYOeDLArlnjhF0MXmNZtyAU5S?= =?utf-8?q?XQ2Bo803RgI4vxNvE6NadLVBpE6TPKMyHO0MjDSGWDkBSO8CJ5xTNrgQu7qmLEZaF?= =?utf-8?q?ryoVGcPB2UtGRyKSF4dFlrSLwu9ZsgGbFT0JaQVwfUrSX7IJmtPtJqZb3VxLwjhoM?= =?utf-8?q?Kh193fDznSlN/52IoXH46PY85DkjQwpEBMOrXh78YW8ctLbJvthCn8fVlHH6D4WYf?= =?utf-8?q?aW9DsGwis5up6AnBqRRVfdIkWM6PoA9BQRDoG/QVBMvf6hV4MnNkN8S1JNiM1sGC4?= =?utf-8?q?SP7NvtmJXhn3+jXv+u/d7GsZq0Y6hzgvK9aCCZ0NjPmKBTbTuM35FrQJCah1s2l1m?= =?utf-8?q?T0ciiylElxIfygi/nvD46or7ILHE7ZvI80ZUjs9wiUszVkxSHmhj7H8CTXdREmb8H?= =?utf-8?q?4EeG9rtEN9TyYOAUCxqL2Tmy3MymVc3WLWqhr9WMtiDobNTf3Qxs69pFYUltW7ze1?= =?utf-8?q?VJI9tfUnKryfLUl6CmrnzNIGJ1pbCiPbGjeXdHosNS0CoSkL9JrC9JNDunA6Wot5g?= =?utf-8?q?ETVPjCJzksk0AmTzbP+2oEG+XK0tUyjZgdMATWGduG7n+4Lo3HrpnKgg16lg2rvaK?= =?utf-8?q?reZJJ2J/N8nvogJ48UeZtknURxGrQ37nHrOYhZs+v8IMj3aQhp+asypg3X/oOmd9Q?= =?utf-8?q?RAo+KiiUHD5p0E0WkE3oHwNtRYQWoFkXtSUOAukRVmt+x2OEgU03gO+J7k4Qs3k1J?= =?utf-8?q?clP+VoBHVOQlPWxVGUF3fnaTkp/+He7I3zd/lnHGpprAi6THRraoGCH5E8QB7RCOX?= =?utf-8?q?tDFLDOCexY73XFts/+7CyVFLTGi1wIsOa6CHKHco1ZDOp94Bb3u67WJPtGnEEoY2U?= =?utf-8?q?8dYakibxU8TVlFrUcOtMF7uZB+8r8eaiYgyTJvztrs1Dd82ZgzHLLUsci6anzPPaT?= =?utf-8?q?nIGDR+KmEJvAvXUpJxjHpg4x0iW3rj9GBnGfq5r5kRwmvX0Gs7yrYd1eAS6UtrNfI?= =?utf-8?q?h/BbiYNPThxVcuDZNNZ4+DvPUQNt61jBC1AdlJrVhNJcCT1qsunM+4EaXqQAlNJ5w?= =?utf-8?q?vQSSOaBJJL85ZHplazIulaYR0JTAGbeC9uGUP7uDYCcK1f7Yu6Xb0fB3nq6Z3AVsF?= =?utf-8?q?Xw4I6ktR0RGSgRvlB/vun5CFYaKMLxgzCQ=3D=3D?= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(1800799024)(36860700013)(376014)(82310400026);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2024 09:49:01.5702 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 64000f0b-e162-4ebb-f0d0-08dd18ffe05b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL6PEPF00020E64.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA1PR12MB9492 Hi Jens, I ran a couple of variants of FIO to check how this patchset affects the FIO numbers. My other motivation with this patchset is to check if it improves the scalability issues that were discussed in [1] and [2]. But for now, here are some initial numbers. To enabled uncached buffered IO, I have modified FIO pvsync2 engine to issue preadv2()/pwritev2() calls with RWF_UNCACHED set. The FIO change looks like below and I assume this is good enough to correctly use this patchset. Also note that I am using your buffered-uncached.8 branch from https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/log/?h=buffered-uncached.8 that has changes to enable uncached buffered IO for EXT4 and block devices. In the below reported numbers, 'base' means kernel from buffered-uncached.8 branch and 'patched' means kernel from buffered-uncached.8 branch + above shown FIO change FIO on EXT4 partitions ====================== nvme1n1 259:12 0 3.5T 0 disk ├─nvme1n1p1 259:13 0 894.3G 0 part /mnt1 ├─nvme1n1p2 259:14 0 894.3G 0 part /mnt2 ├─nvme1n1p3 259:15 0 894.3G 0 part /mnt3 └─nvme1n1p4 259:16 0 894.1G 0 part /mnt4 fio -directory=/mnt4/ -direct=0 -thread -size=3G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest fio -directory=/mnt3/ -direct=0 -thread -size=3G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest fio -directory=/mnt1/ -direct=0 -thread -size=3G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest fio -directory=/mnt2/ -direct=0 -thread -size=3G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest Four NVME devices are formatted with EXT4 and four parallel FIO instances are run on them with the options as shown above. FIO output looks like this: base: READ: bw=1233MiB/s (1293MB/s), 1233MiB/s-1233MiB/s (1293MB/s-1293MB/s), io=4335GiB (4654GB), run=3600097-3600097msec WRITE: bw=529MiB/s (554MB/s), 529MiB/s-529MiB/s (554MB/s-554MB/s), io=1858GiB (1995GB), run=3600097-3600097msec READ: bw=1248MiB/s (1308MB/s), 1248MiB/s-1248MiB/s (1308MB/s-1308MB/s), io=4387GiB (4710GB), run=3600091-3600091msec WRITE: bw=535MiB/s (561MB/s), 535MiB/s-535MiB/s (561MB/s-561MB/s), io=1880GiB (2019GB), run=3600091-3600091msec READ: bw=1235MiB/s (1294MB/s), 1235MiB/s-1235MiB/s (1294MB/s-1294MB/s), io=4340GiB (4660GB), run=3600094-3600094msec WRITE: bw=529MiB/s (555MB/s), 529MiB/s-529MiB/s (555MB/s-555MB/s), io=1860GiB (1997GB), run=3600094-3600094msec READ: bw=1234MiB/s (1294MB/s), 1234MiB/s-1234MiB/s (1294MB/s-1294MB/s), io=4337GiB (4657GB), run=3600093-3600093msec WRITE: bw=529MiB/s (554MB/s), 529MiB/s-529MiB/s (554MB/s-554MB/s), io=1859GiB (1996GB), run=3600093-3600093msec patched: READ: bw=1400MiB/s (1469MB/s), 1400MiB/s-1400MiB/s (1469MB/s-1469MB/s), io=4924GiB (5287GB), run=3600100-3600100msec WRITE: bw=600MiB/s (629MB/s), 600MiB/s-600MiB/s (629MB/s-629MB/s), io=2110GiB (2266GB), run=3600100-3600100msec READ: bw=1395MiB/s (1463MB/s), 1395MiB/s-1395MiB/s (1463MB/s-1463MB/s), io=4904GiB (5266GB), run=3600148-3600148msec WRITE: bw=598MiB/s (627MB/s), 598MiB/s-598MiB/s (627MB/s-627MB/s), io=2102GiB (2257GB), run=3600148-3600148msec READ: bw=1385MiB/s (1452MB/s), 1385MiB/s-1385MiB/s (1452MB/s-1452MB/s), io=4868GiB (5227GB), run=3600136-3600136msec WRITE: bw=594MiB/s (622MB/s), 594MiB/s-594MiB/s (622MB/s-622MB/s), io=2087GiB (2241GB), run=3600136-3600136msec READ: bw=1376MiB/s (1443MB/s), 1376MiB/s-1376MiB/s (1443MB/s-1443MB/s), io=4837GiB (5194GB), run=3600145-3600145msec WRITE: bw=590MiB/s (618MB/s), 590MiB/s-590MiB/s (618MB/s-618MB/s), io=2073GiB (2226GB), run=3600145-3600145msec FIO on block devices ==================== nvme1n1 259:12 0 3.5T 0 disk ├─nvme1n1p1 259:13 0 894.3G 0 part ├─nvme1n1p2 259:14 0 894.3G 0 part ├─nvme1n1p3 259:15 0 894.3G 0 part └─nvme1n1p4 259:16 0 894.1G 0 part fio -filename=/dev/nvme1n1p4 -direct=0 -thread -size=800G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest fio -filename=/dev/nvme1n1p2 -direct=0 -thread -size=800G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest fio -filename=/dev/nvme1n1p1 -direct=0 -thread -size=800G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest fio -filename=/dev/nvme1n1p3 -direct=0 -thread -size=800G -rw=rw -rwmixwrite=30 --norandommap --randrepeat=0 -ioengine=pvsync2 -bs=64k -numjobs=252 -runtime=3600 --time_based -group_reporting -name=mytest Four instances of FIO are run on four different NVME block devices with the options as shown above. base: READ: bw=8712MiB/s (9135MB/s), 8712MiB/s-8712MiB/s (9135MB/s-9135MB/s), io=29.9TiB (32.9TB), run=3600011-3600011msec WRITE: bw=3734MiB/s (3915MB/s), 3734MiB/s-3734MiB/s (3915MB/s-3915MB/s), io=12.8TiB (14.1TB), run=3600011-3600011msec READ: bw=8727MiB/s (9151MB/s), 8727MiB/s-8727MiB/s (9151MB/s-9151MB/s), io=30.0TiB (32.9TB), run=3600005-3600005msec WRITE: bw=3740MiB/s (3922MB/s), 3740MiB/s-3740MiB/s (3922MB/s-3922MB/s), io=12.8TiB (14.1TB), run=3600005-3600005msec READ: bw=8701MiB/s (9123MB/s), 8701MiB/s-8701MiB/s (9123MB/s-9123MB/s), io=29.9TiB (32.8TB), run=3600004-3600004msec WRITE: bw=3729MiB/s (3910MB/s), 3729MiB/s-3729MiB/s (3910MB/s-3910MB/s), io=12.8TiB (14.1TB), run=3600004-3600004msec READ: bw=8706MiB/s (9128MB/s), 8706MiB/s-8706MiB/s (9128MB/s-9128MB/s), io=29.9TiB (32.9TB), run=3600005-3600005msec WRITE: bw=3731MiB/s (3913MB/s), 3731MiB/s-3731MiB/s (3913MB/s-3913MB/s), io=12.8TiB (14.1TB), run=3600005-3600005msec patched: READ: bw=1844MiB/s (1933MB/s), 1844MiB/s-1844MiB/s (1933MB/s-1933MB/s), io=6500GiB (6980GB), run=3610641-3610641msec WRITE: bw=790MiB/s (828MB/s), 790MiB/s-790MiB/s (828MB/s-828MB/s), io=2786GiB (2991GB), run=3610642-3610642msec READ: bw=1753MiB/s (1838MB/s), 1753MiB/s-1753MiB/s (1838MB/s-1838MB/s), io=6235GiB (6695GB), run=3641973-3641973msec WRITE: bw=751MiB/s (788MB/s), 751MiB/s-751MiB/s (788MB/s-788MB/s), io=2672GiB (2869GB), run=3641969-3641969msec READ: bw=1078MiB/s (1130MB/s), 1078MiB/s-1078MiB/s (1130MB/s-1130MB/s), io=3788GiB (4068GB), run=3600007-3600007msec WRITE: bw=462MiB/s (484MB/s), 462MiB/s-462MiB/s (484MB/s-484MB/s), io=1624GiB (1743GB), run=3600007-3600007msec READ: bw=1752MiB/s (1838MB/s), 1752MiB/s-1752MiB/s (1838MB/s-1838MB/s), io=6234GiB (6694GB), run=3642657-3642657msec WRITE: bw=751MiB/s (788MB/s), 751MiB/s-751MiB/s (788MB/s-788MB/s), io=2672GiB (2869GB), run=3642622-3642622msec While FIO on FS shows improvement, FIO on block shows numbers going down. Is this expected or am I missing enabling anything else for the block option? Regards, Bharata. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/d2841226-e27b-4d3d-a578-63587a3aa4f3@amd.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20241127054737.33351-1-bharata@amd.com/ diff --git a/engines/sync.c b/engines/sync.c index b8be4eb3..44e9da3d 100644 --- a/engines/sync.c +++ b/engines/sync.c @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ static enum fio_q_status fio_pvsyncio2_queue(struct thread_data *td, if (o->nowait) flags |= RWF_NOWAIT; + flags |= RWF_UNCACHED; + iov->iov_base = io_u->xfer_buf; iov->iov_len = io_u->xfer_buflen;