Message ID | 20250129160641.35485-1-mszeredi@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | selftests: always check mask returned by statmount(2) | expand |
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 17:06:41 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > STATMOUNT_MNT_OPTS can actually be missing if there are no options. This > is a change of behavior since 75ead69a7173 ("fs: don't let statmount return > empty strings"). > > The other checks shouldn't actually trigger, but add them for correctness > and for easier debugging if the test fails. > > [...] Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon. Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it. It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated. Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase, trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch. tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git branch: vfs.fixes [1/1] selftests: always check mask returned by statmount(2) https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/1213f42dca09
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c index 8eb6aa606a0d..46d289611ce8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c @@ -383,6 +383,10 @@ static void test_statmount_mnt_point(void) return; } + if (!(sm->mask & STATMOUNT_MNT_POINT)) { + ksft_test_result_fail("missing STATMOUNT_MNT_POINT in mask\n"); + return; + } if (strcmp(sm->str + sm->mnt_point, "/") != 0) { ksft_test_result_fail("unexpected mount point: '%s' != '/'\n", sm->str + sm->mnt_point); @@ -408,6 +412,10 @@ static void test_statmount_mnt_root(void) strerror(errno)); return; } + if (!(sm->mask & STATMOUNT_MNT_ROOT)) { + ksft_test_result_fail("missing STATMOUNT_MNT_ROOT in mask\n"); + return; + } mnt_root = sm->str + sm->mnt_root; last_root = strrchr(mnt_root, '/'); if (last_root) @@ -437,6 +445,10 @@ static void test_statmount_fs_type(void) strerror(errno)); return; } + if (!(sm->mask & STATMOUNT_FS_TYPE)) { + ksft_test_result_fail("missing STATMOUNT_FS_TYPE in mask\n"); + return; + } fs_type = sm->str + sm->fs_type; for (s = known_fs; s != NULL; s++) { if (strcmp(fs_type, *s) == 0) @@ -464,6 +476,11 @@ static void test_statmount_mnt_opts(void) return; } + if (!(sm->mask & STATMOUNT_MNT_BASIC)) { + ksft_test_result_fail("missing STATMOUNT_MNT_BASIC in mask\n"); + return; + } + while (getline(&line, &len, f_mountinfo) != -1) { int i; char *p, *p2; @@ -514,7 +531,10 @@ static void test_statmount_mnt_opts(void) if (p2) *p2 = '\0'; - statmount_opts = sm->str + sm->mnt_opts; + if (sm->mask & STATMOUNT_MNT_OPTS) + statmount_opts = sm->str + sm->mnt_opts; + else + statmount_opts = ""; if (strcmp(statmount_opts, p) != 0) ksft_test_result_fail( "unexpected mount options: '%s' != '%s'\n",
STATMOUNT_MNT_OPTS can actually be missing if there are no options. This is a change of behavior since 75ead69a7173 ("fs: don't let statmount return empty strings"). The other checks shouldn't actually trigger, but add them for correctness and for easier debugging if the test fails. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> --- .../filesystems/statmount/statmount_test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)