From patchwork Thu Aug 24 03:21:33 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: NeilBrown X-Patchwork-Id: 9918941 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183F5602A0 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1031128B08 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 04BC128B19; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:22:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCD728B0E for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751112AbdHXDVq (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2017 23:21:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58623 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbdHXDVp (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2017 23:21:45 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754F4AE1E; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 03:21:43 +0000 (UTC) From: NeilBrown To: Ian Kent , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust , "viro\@zeniv.linux.org.uk" Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:21:33 +1000 Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "mkoutny\@suse.com" , "linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" , David Howells Subject: Re: Do we really need d_weak_revalidate??? In-Reply-To: <1bfd81b3-4f16-b0a7-6b51-0c0cb23ed0a0@redhat.com> References: <87bmnmrai9.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <1502430944.3822.1.camel@primarydata.com> <1502449309.4950.2.camel@redhat.com> <87zib3niqn.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <1502705432.4978.1.camel@redhat.com> <877ey4nsep.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <1502883253.4847.6.camel@redhat.com> <1e4665a6-30d6-c16a-760a-2892fb147760@redhat.com> <878tihmora.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <2e289bba-677b-cc50-5fa3-2d24d1f6b858@redhat.com> <87h8x1l9qp.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <733c15c2-ffbb-9a89-90ec-3ba1d574590e@redhat.com> <87r2w3jdn5.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <42ba2fa5-d756-d70f-370c-c2fe1a61c5bf@redhat.com> <1bfd81b3-4f16-b0a7-6b51-0c0cb23ed0a0@redhat.com> Message-ID: <87lgm9k5vm.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Wed, Aug 23 2017, Ian Kent wrote: > On 23/08/17 10:32, Ian Kent wrote: >> On 23/08/17 09:06, NeilBrown wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 21 2017, Ian Kent wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> A mount isn't triggered by kern_path(pathname, 0, &path). >>>>> That '0' would need to include one of >>>>> LOOKUP_PARENT | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY | >>>>> LOOKUP_OPEN | LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT >>>>> >>>>> to trigger an automount (otherwise you just get -EISDIR). >>>> >>>> It's perfectly sensible to think that but there is a case where a >>>> a mount is triggered when using kern_path(). >>>> >>>> The EISDIR return occurs for positive dentrys, negative dentrys >>>> will still trigger an automount (which is autofs specific, >>>> indirect mount map using nobrowse option, the install default). >>> >>> Ok, I understand this better now. This difference between direct and >>> indirect mounts is slightly awkward. It is visible from user-space, but >>> not elegant to document. >>> When you use O_PATH to open a direct automount that has not already been >>> triggered, the open returns the underlying directory (and fstatfs >>> confirms that it is AUTOFS_SUPER_MAGIC). When you use O_PATH on >>> an indirect automount, it *will* trigger the automount when "nobrowse" is >>> in effect, but it won't when "browse" is in effect. >> >> That inconsistency has bothered me for quite a while now. >> >> It was carried over from the autofs module behavior when automounting >> support was added to the VFS. What's worse is it prevents the use of >> the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag from working properly with fstatat(2) and with >> statx(). >> >> There is some risk in changing that so it does work but it really does >> need to work to enable userspace to not trigger an automount by using >> this flag. >> >> So that's (hopefully) going to change soonish, see: >> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/autofs-fix-at_no_automount-not-being-honored.patch >> >> The result should be that stat family calls don't trigger automounts except >> for fstatat(2) and statx() which will require the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT flag. >> >>> >>> So we cannot just say "O_PATH doesn't trigger automounts", which is >>> essentially what I said in >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git/commit/?id=97a45d02e6671482e8b2cdcce3951930bf6bdb94 >>> >>> It might be possible to modify automount so that it was more consistent >>> - i.e. if the point is triggered by a mkdir has been done, just to the >>> mkdir. If it is triggered after a mkdir has been done, do the mount. I >>> guess that might be racy, and in any case is hard to justify. >>> >>> Maybe I should change it to be about "direct automounts", and add a note >>> that indirect automounts aren't so predictable. >> >> Right and the semantics should be much more consistent in the near future. >> I hope (and expect) this semantic change won't cause problems. >> >>> >>> But back to my original issue of wanting to discard >>> kern_path_mountpoint, what would you think of the following approach - >>> slight revised from before. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> NeilBrown >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h >>> index beef981aa54f..7663ea82e68d 100644 >>> --- a/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h >>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/autofs_i.h >>> @@ -135,10 +135,13 @@ static inline struct autofs_info *autofs4_dentry_ino(struct dentry *dentry) >>> /* autofs4_oz_mode(): do we see the man behind the curtain? (The >>> * processes which do manipulations for us in user space sees the raw >>> * filesystem without "magic".) >>> + * A process performing certain ioctls can get temporary oz status. >>> */ >>> +extern struct task_struct *autofs_tmp_oz; >>> static inline int autofs4_oz_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi) >>> { >>> - return sbi->catatonic || task_pgrp(current) == sbi->oz_pgrp; >>> + return sbi->catatonic || task_pgrp(current) == sbi->oz_pgrp || >>> + autofs_tmp_oz == current; >>> } >>> >>> struct inode *autofs4_get_inode(struct super_block *, umode_t); >>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c >>> index dd9f1bebb5a3..d76401669a20 100644 >>> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c >>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c >>> @@ -200,6 +200,20 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_protosubver(struct file *fp, >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> +struct task_struct *autofs_tmp_oz; >>> +int kern_path_oz(const char *pathname, int flags, struct path *path) >>> +{ >>> + static DEFINE_MUTEX(autofs_oz); >>> + int err; >>> + >>> + mutex_lock(&autofs_oz); >>> + autofs_tmp_oz = current; >>> + err = kern_path(pathname, flags, path); >>> + autofs_tmp_oz = NULL; >>> + mutex_unlock(&autofs_oz); >>> + return err; >>> +} >>> + >> >> It's simple enough but does look like it will attract criticism as being >> a hack! >> >> The kern_path_locked() function is very similar to what was originally >> done, along with code to look down the mount stack (rather than up the >> way it does now) to get the mount point. In this case, to be valid the >> dentry can't be a symlink so that fits kern_path_locked() too. > > Oh wait, that __lookup_hash() tries too hard to resolve the dentry, > that won't quite work, and maybe d_lookup() can't be used safely in > this context either .... > Why do you think that __look_hash() tries too hard? It does call into the filesystem ->lookup() if the name isn't in the cache, which probably isn't strictly needed, but that isn't harmful and the current code does that. Some the following seems sensible to me (though I haven't tested it). Thanks, NeilBrown diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c index dd9f1bebb5a3..859c198d0163 100644 --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c @@ -208,12 +208,16 @@ static int find_autofs_mount(const char *pathname, { struct path path; int err; + struct dentry *de, *parent; + + de = kern_path_locked(pathname, &path); + if (IS_ERR(de)) + return PTR_ERR(de); + parent = path.dentry; + path.dentry = de; - err = kern_path_mountpoint(AT_FDCWD, pathname, &path, 0); - if (err) - return err; err = -ENOENT; - while (path.dentry == path.mnt->mnt_root) { + do { if (path.dentry->d_sb->s_magic == AUTOFS_SUPER_MAGIC) { if (test(&path, data)) { path_get(&path); @@ -222,10 +226,11 @@ static int find_autofs_mount(const char *pathname, break; } } - if (!follow_up(&path)) - break; - } + } while (follow_down_one(&path)); + path_put(&path); + inode_unlock(d_inode(parent)); + dput(parent); return err; }