diff mbox series

[02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()

Message ID b3e929a77303dd47fd2adc2a1011009d3bfcee20.1627424774.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function | expand

Commit Message

Tom Lendacky July 27, 2021, 10:26 p.m. UTC
Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
sev_active(), etc.

While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().

The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
sme_me_mask to EXPORT_SYBMOL:
  commit 87df26175e67 ("x86/mm: Unbreak modules that rely on external PAGE_KERNEL availability")
  commit 9d5f38ba6c82 ("x86/mm: Unbreak modules that use the DMA API")

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig                       |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h     |  2 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/protected_guest.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c              | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/protected_guest.h        |  5 +++++
 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/protected_guest.h

Comments

Christoph Hellwig July 28, 2021, 1:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
> 
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
> 
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and

None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
random macros.  The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
tell.
Tom Lendacky July 29, 2021, 2:24 p.m. UTC | #2
On 7/28/21 8:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote:
>> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
>> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
>> sev_active(), etc.
>>
>> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
>> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
>>
>> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
>> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
> 
> None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into
> random macros.  The only case of that is sme_me_mask through
> sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can
> tell.

Ok, let me make sure of that and I'll change to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL if
that's the case.

Thanks,
Tom

>
Joerg Roedel Aug. 2, 2021, 10:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be
> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like
> sev_active(), etc.
> 
> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will
> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active().
> 
> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the
> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and
> sme_me_mask to EXPORT_SYBMOL:
>   commit 87df26175e67 ("x86/mm: Unbreak modules that rely on external PAGE_KERNEL availability")
>   commit 9d5f38ba6c82 ("x86/mm: Unbreak modules that use the DMA API")
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Co-developed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 49270655e827..e47213cbfc55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1514,6 +1514,7 @@  config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
 	select ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
 	select INSTRUCTION_DECODER
 	select ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
+	select ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST
 	help
 	  Say yes to enable support for the encryption of system memory.
 	  This requires an AMD processor that supports Secure Memory
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 9c80c68d75b5..a46d47662772 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@  void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void);
 bool sme_active(void);
 bool sev_active(void);
 bool sev_es_active(void);
+bool amd_prot_guest_has(unsigned int attr);
 
 #define __bss_decrypted __section(".bss..decrypted")
 
@@ -78,6 +79,7 @@  static inline void sev_es_init_vc_handling(void) { }
 static inline bool sme_active(void) { return false; }
 static inline bool sev_active(void) { return false; }
 static inline bool sev_es_active(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool amd_prot_guest_has(unsigned int attr) { return false; }
 
 static inline int __init
 early_set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size) { return 0; }
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/protected_guest.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/protected_guest.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b4a267dddf93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/protected_guest.h
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ 
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Protected Guest (and Host) Capability checks
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ *
+ * Author: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _X86_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
+#define _X86_PROTECTED_GUEST_H
+
+#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+
+static inline bool prot_guest_has(unsigned int attr)
+{
+	if (sme_me_mask)
+		return amd_prot_guest_has(attr);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+#endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#endif	/* _X86_PROTECTED_GUEST_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index ff08dc463634..7d3b2c6f5f88 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
+#include <linux/protected_guest.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <asm/fixmap.h>
@@ -389,6 +390,30 @@  bool noinstr sev_es_active(void)
 	return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED;
 }
 
+bool amd_prot_guest_has(unsigned int attr)
+{
+	switch (attr) {
+	case PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT:
+		return sme_me_mask != 0;
+
+	case PATTR_SME:
+	case PATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT:
+		return sme_active();
+
+	case PATTR_SEV:
+	case PATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT:
+		return sev_active();
+
+	case PATTR_SEV_ES:
+	case PATTR_GUEST_PROT_STATE:
+		return sev_es_active();
+
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(amd_prot_guest_has);
+
 /* Override for DMA direct allocation check - ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED */
 bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/protected_guest.h b/include/linux/protected_guest.h
index f8ed7b72967b..7a7120abbb62 100644
--- a/include/linux/protected_guest.h
+++ b/include/linux/protected_guest.h
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ 
 #define PATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT		2	/* Guest encrypted memory */
 #define PATTR_GUEST_PROT_STATE		3	/* Guest encrypted state */
 
+/* 0x800 - 0x8ff reserved for AMD */
+#define PATTR_SME			0x800
+#define PATTR_SEV			0x801
+#define PATTR_SEV_ES			0x802
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST
 
 #include <asm/protected_guest.h>