diff mbox

[v13,5/6] fs/proc: Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system

Message ID 1527365430-8303-6-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Alexander Popov May 26, 2018, 8:10 p.m. UTC
Introduce CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS providing STACKLEAK information about
tasks via the /proc file system. In particular, /proc/<pid>/stack_depth
shows the maximum kernel stack consumption for the current and previous
syscalls. Although this information is not precise, it can be useful for
estimating the STACKLEAK performance impact for your workloads.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
---
 arch/Kconfig              | 12 ++++++++++++
 fs/proc/base.c            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/sched.h     |  1 +
 include/linux/stackleak.h |  3 +++
 kernel/stackleak.c        |  4 ++++
 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 46fe6c8..ee213f2 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -576,6 +576,18 @@  config STACKLEAK_TRACK_MIN_SIZE
 	  a stack frame size greater than or equal to this parameter.
 	  If unsure, leave the default value 100.
 
+config STACKLEAK_METRICS
+	bool "Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system"
+	depends on GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
+	depends on PROC_FS
+	help
+	  If this is set, STACKLEAK metrics for every task are available in
+	  the /proc file system. In particular, /proc/<pid>/stack_depth
+	  shows the maximum kernel stack consumption for the current and
+	  previous syscalls. Although this information is not precise, it
+	  can be useful for estimating the STACKLEAK performance impact for
+	  your workloads.
+
 config HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
 	bool
 	help
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 1a76d75..5a97edf 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2924,6 +2924,21 @@  static int proc_pid_patch_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
+static int proc_stack_depth(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
+				struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	unsigned long prev_depth = THREAD_SIZE -
+				(task->prev_lowest_stack & (THREAD_SIZE - 1));
+	unsigned long depth = THREAD_SIZE -
+				(task->lowest_stack & (THREAD_SIZE - 1));
+
+	seq_printf(m, "previous stack depth: %lu\nstack depth: %lu\n",
+							prev_depth, depth);
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS */
+
 /*
  * Thread groups
  */
@@ -3025,6 +3040,9 @@  static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
 	ONE("patch_state",  S_IRUSR, proc_pid_patch_state),
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
+	ONE("stack_depth", S_IRUGO, proc_stack_depth),
+#endif
 };
 
 static int proc_tgid_base_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 050906f..3456d7c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1170,6 +1170,7 @@  struct task_struct {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
 	unsigned long			lowest_stack;
+	unsigned long			prev_lowest_stack;
 #endif
 
 	/*
diff --git a/include/linux/stackleak.h b/include/linux/stackleak.h
index 743c911..e2da99b 100644
--- a/include/linux/stackleak.h
+++ b/include/linux/stackleak.h
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@  static inline void stackleak_task_init(struct task_struct *task)
 #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
 	task->lowest_stack = (unsigned long)end_of_stack(task) +
 						sizeof(unsigned long);
+# ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
+	task->prev_lowest_stack = task->lowest_stack;
+# endif
 #endif
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/stackleak.c b/kernel/stackleak.c
index 7343f41..8cb29fb 100644
--- a/kernel/stackleak.c
+++ b/kernel/stackleak.c
@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@  asmlinkage void stackleak_erase_kstack(void)
 	if (kstack_ptr == boundary)
 		kstack_ptr += sizeof(unsigned long);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
+	current->prev_lowest_stack = kstack_ptr;
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * Now write the poison value to the kernel stack. Start from
 	 * 'kstack_ptr' and move up till the new 'boundary'. We assume that