| Message ID | 20170522013233.21780-2-dja@axtens.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> writes: > prom_init is a bit special; in theory it should be able to be > linked separately to the kernel. To keep this from getting too > complex, the symbols that prom_init.c uses are checked. > > Fortification adds symbols, and it gets quite messy as it includes > things like panic(). So just don't fortify prom_init.c for now. Calling panic() at that point is unlikely to work well. > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> > > --- > > This will need to go in before the main fortify support, but it > doesn't make any sense in the absence of fortify. I think it would > make most sense for Kees to queue this up with the main fortify patch, > with an Ack from mpe? Yeah that's fine by me. > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c > index dd8a04f3053a..613f79f03877 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c > @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ > > #undef DEBUG_PROM > > +/* we cannot use FORTIFY as it brings in new symbols */ > +#define __NO_FORTIFY > + > #include <stdarg.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/string.h> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> cheers
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index dd8a04f3053a..613f79f03877 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ #undef DEBUG_PROM +/* we cannot use FORTIFY as it brings in new symbols */ +#define __NO_FORTIFY + #include <stdarg.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/string.h>
prom_init is a bit special; in theory it should be able to be linked separately to the kernel. To keep this from getting too complex, the symbols that prom_init.c uses are checked. Fortification adds symbols, and it gets quite messy as it includes things like panic(). So just don't fortify prom_init.c for now. Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> --- This will need to go in before the main fortify support, but it doesn't make any sense in the absence of fortify. I think it would make most sense for Kees to queue this up with the main fortify patch, with an Ack from mpe? --- arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)