From patchwork Wed Jun 7 23:25:58 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Jason A. Donenfeld" X-Patchwork-Id: 9773259 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEE460234 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F40283AD for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 75D322848D; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BFD7283AD for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26101 invoked by uid 550); 7 Jun 2017 23:26:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 26046 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2017 23:26:25 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; s=mail; bh=CEl3 SZwHmEChf0jQgaJFq+nROLQ=; b=syg1tcRHXFdt3DiDtRutPMT65eyqLspsdFHo +wn8ac0yMjAl/9U4GoU3TK0bAUxAySIN93oo9/AZjSpQl3OfCmzaVBFuLBhMVs9b MfmfXxCoPraJm1eyO/amkbhWfHgNoCzZGsoSviJqAamTjwRu5szpxsmDHb3qmllI xeLNEWNNExdgJEu5uE48iewnsi2kBAilis58a9Be9U9Eo/NI7YCqeEnxvSBx/BC3 NGl//MXqVZTTOnw/o/S7IYjOyYvWD7Kxs881NjX8g+jbCt/LL0pnF4iqCkOrQAqy gFCy6EXFRTeFrpaRy9wPv2zwU3Fv+We0u0/BehslDNvFaRWDLw== From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: Theodore Ts'o , Linux Crypto Mailing List , LKML , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Eric Biggers , Linus Torvalds , David Miller Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , David Howells , Mimi Zohar , David Safford Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 01:25:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20170607232607.26870-5-Jason@zx2c4.com> In-Reply-To: <20170607232607.26870-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> References: <20170607232607.26870-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 04/13] security/keys: ensure RNG is seeded before use X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Otherwise, we might use bad random numbers which, particularly in the case of IV generation, could be quite bad. It makes sense to use the synchronous API here, because we're always in process context (as the code is littered with GFP_KERNEL and the like). However, we can't change to using a blocking function in key serial allocation, because this will block booting in some configurations, so here we use the more appropriate get_random_u32, which will use RDRAND if available. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Cc: David Howells Cc: Mimi Zohar Cc: David Safford --- security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c | 8 +++++--- security/keys/key.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c index 0010955d7876..d51a28fc5cd5 100644 --- a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c +++ b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c @@ -777,10 +777,12 @@ static int encrypted_init(struct encrypted_key_payload *epayload, __ekey_init(epayload, format, master_desc, datalen); if (!hex_encoded_iv) { - get_random_bytes(epayload->iv, ivsize); + ret = get_random_bytes_wait(epayload->iv, ivsize); + if (unlikely(ret)) + return ret; - get_random_bytes(epayload->decrypted_data, - epayload->decrypted_datalen); + ret = get_random_bytes_wait(epayload->decrypted_data, + epayload->decrypted_datalen); } else ret = encrypted_key_decrypt(epayload, format, hex_encoded_iv); return ret; diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c index 455c04d80bbb..b72078e532f2 100644 --- a/security/keys/key.c +++ b/security/keys/key.c @@ -134,17 +134,15 @@ void key_user_put(struct key_user *user) * Allocate a serial number for a key. These are assigned randomly to avoid * security issues through covert channel problems. */ -static inline void key_alloc_serial(struct key *key) +static inline int key_alloc_serial(struct key *key) { struct rb_node *parent, **p; struct key *xkey; - /* propose a random serial number and look for a hole for it in the - * serial number tree */ + /* propose a non-negative random serial number and look for a hole for + * it in the serial number tree */ do { - get_random_bytes(&key->serial, sizeof(key->serial)); - - key->serial >>= 1; /* negative numbers are not permitted */ + key->serial = get_random_u32() >> 1; } while (key->serial < 3); spin_lock(&key_serial_lock); @@ -170,7 +168,7 @@ static inline void key_alloc_serial(struct key *key) rb_insert_color(&key->serial_node, &key_serial_tree); spin_unlock(&key_serial_lock); - return; + return 0; /* we found a key with the proposed serial number - walk the tree from * that point looking for the next unused serial number */ @@ -314,7 +312,9 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc, /* publish the key by giving it a serial number */ atomic_inc(&user->nkeys); - key_alloc_serial(key); + ret = key_alloc_serial(key); + if (ret < 0) + goto security_error; error: return key;