@@ -1028,42 +1028,13 @@ int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
return 1;
- /*
- * fixup routine could not handle it,
- * Let do_page_fault() fix it.
- */
+ /* fixup routine could not handle it. */
}
return 0;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_fault_handler);
-/*
- * Wrapper routine for handling exceptions.
- */
-int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
- void *data)
-{
- struct die_args *args = data;
- int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
-
- if (args->regs && user_mode(args->regs))
- return ret;
-
- if (val == DIE_GPF) {
- /*
- * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to
- * trust the result from kprobe_running(), we have
- * be non-preemptible.
- */
- if (!preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
- kprobe_fault_handler(args->regs, args->trapnr))
- ret = NOTIFY_STOP;
- }
- return ret;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
-
bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
{
bool is_in_entry_trampoline_section = false;
@@ -556,6 +556,16 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_GP;
+
+ /*
+ * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to
+ * trust the result from kprobe_running(), we have to
+ * be non-preemptible.
+ */
+ if (!preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
+ kprobe_fault_handler(regs, X86_TRAP_GP))
+ return;
+
if (notify_die(DIE_GPF, "general protection fault", regs, error_code,
X86_TRAP_GP, SIGSEGV) != NOTIFY_STOP)
die("general protection fault", regs, error_code);
The opaque plumbing of #GP from do_general_protection() through notify_die() into kprobe_exceptions_notify() makes it hard to understand what's going on. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 31 +------------------------------ arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)