@@ -16,7 +16,19 @@
#define INIT_TEST_VAL 0xC3
+/*
+ * Note: __ro_after_init data is, for every practical effect, equivalent to
+ * const data, since they are even write protected at the same time; there
+ * is no need for separate testing.
+ * __wr_after_init data, otoh, is altered also after the write protection
+ * takes place and it cannot be exploitable for altering more permanent
+ * data.
+ */
+
static const int rodata_test_data = INIT_TEST_VAL;
+static int wr_after_init_test_data __wr_after_init = INIT_TEST_VAL;
+extern long __start_wr_after_init;
+extern long __end_wr_after_init;
static bool test_data(char *data_type, const int *data,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
@@ -60,6 +72,9 @@ void rodata_test(void)
{
if (test_data("rodata", &rodata_test_data,
(unsigned long)&__start_rodata,
- (unsigned long)&__end_rodata))
+ (unsigned long)&__end_rodata) &&
+ test_data("wr after init data", &wr_after_init_test_data,
+ (unsigned long)&__start_wr_after_init,
+ (unsigned long)&__end_wr_after_init))
pr_info("all tests were successful\n");
}
The write protection of the __wr_after_init data can be verified with the same methodology used for const data. Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> CC: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> CC: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org CC: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com CC: linux-mm@kvack.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- mm/rodata_test.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)