From patchwork Wed Dec 12 00:03:53 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rick Edgecombe X-Patchwork-Id: 10725339 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3032159A for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936112B587 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 870E32B591; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:12:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9E2D2B587 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30168 invoked by uid 550); 12 Dec 2018 00:12:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Delivered-To: mailing list kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 30062 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2018 00:12:23 -0000 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,343,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="282839406" From: Rick Edgecombe To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, jeyu@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jannh@google.com Cc: kristen@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, deneen.t.dock@intel.com, Rick Edgecombe Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] bpf: switch to new vmalloc vfree flags Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:03:53 -0800 Message-Id: <20181212000354.31955-4-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181212000354.31955-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> References: <20181212000354.31955-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This switches to use the new vmalloc flags to control freeing memory with special permissions. Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe --- include/linux/filter.h | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 795ff0b869bb..2aeb93d3337d 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include @@ -487,7 +488,6 @@ struct bpf_prog { u16 pages; /* Number of allocated pages */ u16 jited:1, /* Is our filter JIT'ed? */ jit_requested:1,/* archs need to JIT the prog */ - undo_set_mem:1, /* Passed set_memory_ro() checkpoint */ gpl_compatible:1, /* Is filter GPL compatible? */ cb_access:1, /* Is control block accessed? */ dst_needed:1, /* Do we need dst entry? */ @@ -699,24 +699,23 @@ bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default) static inline void bpf_prog_lock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp) { - fp->undo_set_mem = 1; - set_memory_ro((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); -} + struct vm_struct *vm = find_vm_area(fp); -static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp) -{ - if (fp->undo_set_mem) - set_memory_rw((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); + if (vm) + vm->flags |= VM_HAS_SPECIAL_PERMS; + set_memory_ro((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); } static inline void bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) { - set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); -} + struct vm_struct *vm = find_vm_area(hdr); -static inline void bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) -{ - set_memory_rw((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); + if (vm) { + vm->flags |= VM_HAS_SPECIAL_PERMS; + vm->flags |= VM_IMMEDIATE_UNMAP; + } + + set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); } static inline struct bpf_binary_header * @@ -746,7 +745,6 @@ void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp); static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_free(struct bpf_prog *fp) { - bpf_prog_unlock_ro(fp); __bpf_prog_free(fp); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index b1a3545d0ec8..bd3efd7ce526 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -663,7 +663,6 @@ void __weak bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp) if (fp->jited) { struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = bpf_jit_binary_hdr(fp); - bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(hdr); bpf_jit_binary_free(hdr); WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(fp));