@@ -53,6 +53,19 @@ static unsigned int arm_pertask_ssp_rtl_execute(void)
#define NO_GATE
#include "gcc-generate-rtl-pass.h"
+#if BUILDING_GCC_VERSION >= 9000
+static bool no(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static void arm_pertask_ssp_start_unit(void *gcc_data, void *user_data)
+{
+ targetm.have_stack_protect_combined_set = no;
+ targetm.have_stack_protect_combined_test = no;
+}
+#endif
+
__visible int plugin_init(struct plugin_name_args *plugin_info,
struct plugin_gcc_version *version)
{
@@ -100,5 +113,10 @@ __visible int plugin_init(struct plugin_name_args *plugin_info,
register_callback(plugin_info->base_name, PLUGIN_PASS_MANAGER_SETUP,
NULL, &arm_pertask_ssp_rtl_pass_info);
+#if BUILDING_GCC_VERSION >= 9000
+ register_callback(plugin_info->base_name, PLUGIN_START_UNIT,
+ arm_pertask_ssp_start_unit, NULL);
+#endif
+
return 0;
}
GCC 9 reworks the way the references to the stack canary are emitted, to prevent the value from being spilled to the stack before the final comparison in the epilogue, defeating the purpose, given that the spill slot is under control of the attacker that we are protecting ourselves from. Since our canary value address is obtained without accessing memory (as opposed to pre-v7 code that will obtain it from a literal pool), it is unlikely (although not guaranteed) that the compiler will spill the canary value in the same way, so let's just disable this improvement when building with GCC9+. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> --- scripts/gcc-plugins/arm_ssp_per_task_plugin.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)