diff mbox series

[net-next,v5] skbuff: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size

Message ID 20221025223811.up.360-kees@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined
Commit 12d6c1d3a2ad0c199ec57c201cdc71e8e157a232
Headers show
Series [net-next,v5] skbuff: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size | expand

Commit Message

Kees Cook Oct. 25, 2022, 10:39 p.m. UTC 
Instead of discovering the kmalloc bucket size _after_ allocation, round
up proactively so the allocation is explicitly made for the full size,
allowing the compiler to correctly reason about the resulting size of
the buffer through the existing __alloc_size() hint.

This will allow for kernels built with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS or the
coming dynamic bounds checking under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE to gain
back the __alloc_size() hints that were temporarily reverted in commit
93dd04ab0b2b ("slab: remove __alloc_size attribute from __kmalloc_track_caller")

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20221021234713.you.031-kees@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
v5: update comment (vbabka)
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221021234713.you.031-kees@kernel.org/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221018093005.give.246-kees@kernel.org
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220923202822.2667581-4-keescook@chromium.org
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Oct. 27, 2022, 2 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:39:35 -0700 you wrote:
> Instead of discovering the kmalloc bucket size _after_ allocation, round
> up proactively so the allocation is explicitly made for the full size,
> allowing the compiler to correctly reason about the resulting size of
> the buffer through the existing __alloc_size() hint.
> 
> This will allow for kernels built with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS or the
> coming dynamic bounds checking under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE to gain
> back the __alloc_size() hints that were temporarily reverted in commit
> 93dd04ab0b2b ("slab: remove __alloc_size attribute from __kmalloc_track_caller")
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v5] skbuff: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/12d6c1d3a2ad

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 1d9719e72f9d..21911e4c0aca 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -506,14 +506,14 @@  struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	 */
 	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
 	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
+	osize = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(osize, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
 	if (unlikely(!data))
 		goto nodata;
-	/* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested.
+	/* kmalloc_size_roundup() might give us more room than requested.
 	 * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone,
 	 * to allow max possible filling before reallocation.
 	 */
-	osize = ksize(data);
 	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize);
 	prefetchw(data + size);
 
@@ -1814,10 +1814,11 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pskb_copy_fclone);
 int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
 		     gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
-	int i, osize = skb_end_offset(skb);
-	int size = osize + nhead + ntail;
+	unsigned int osize = skb_end_offset(skb);
+	unsigned int size = osize + nhead + ntail;
 	long off;
 	u8 *data;
+	int i;
 
 	BUG_ON(nhead < 0);
 
@@ -1825,15 +1826,16 @@  int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
 
 	skb_zcopy_downgrade_managed(skb);
 
-	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
-
 	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
-			       gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+	size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
 	if (!data)
 		goto nodata;
-	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
+	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
 
 	/* Copy only real data... and, alas, header. This should be
 	 * optimized for the cases when header is void.
@@ -6167,21 +6169,20 @@  static int pskb_carve_inside_header(struct sk_buff *skb, const u32 off,
 				    const int headlen, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	int i;
-	int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
+	unsigned int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
 	int new_hlen = headlen - off;
 	u8 *data;
 
-	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
-
 	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size +
-			       SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
-			       gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+	size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
+	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
 
 	/* Copy real data, and all frags */
 	skb_copy_from_linear_data_offset(skb, off, data, new_hlen);
@@ -6286,22 +6287,21 @@  static int pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear(struct sk_buff *skb, const u32 off,
 				       int pos, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	int i, k = 0;
-	int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
+	unsigned int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
 	u8 *data;
 	const int nfrags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
 
-	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
-
 	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size +
-			       SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
-			       gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+	size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
+	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
 
 	memcpy((struct skb_shared_info *)(data + size),
 	       skb_shinfo(skb), offsetof(struct skb_shared_info, frags[0]));