diff mbox series

crypto: qat - use kcalloc_node() instead of kzalloc_node()

Message ID 20240121164043.11222-1-erick.archer@gmx.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series crypto: qat - use kcalloc_node() instead of kzalloc_node() | expand

Commit Message

Erick Archer Jan. 21, 2024, 4:40 p.m. UTC
As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.

So, use the purpose specific kcalloc_node() function instead of the
argument count * size in the kzalloc_node() function.

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/adf_isr.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.25.1

Comments

Gustavo A. R. Silva Jan. 22, 2024, 5:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On 1/21/24 10:40, Erick Archer wrote:
> As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> 
> So, use the purpose specific kcalloc_node() function instead of the
> argument count * size in the kzalloc_node() function.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Thanks!
Cabiddu, Giovanni Jan. 23, 2024, 12:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 05:40:43PM +0100, Erick Archer wrote:
> As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> 
> So, use the purpose specific kcalloc_node() function instead of the
> argument count * size in the kzalloc_node() function.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
Acked-by: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Herbert Xu Jan. 26, 2024, 9:06 a.m. UTC | #3
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 05:40:43PM +0100, Erick Archer wrote:
> As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> 
> So, use the purpose specific kcalloc_node() function instead of the
> argument count * size in the kzalloc_node() function.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/adf_isr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/adf_isr.c b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/adf_isr.c
index 3557a0d6dea2..a13d9885d60f 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/adf_isr.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/adf_isr.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@  static int adf_isr_alloc_msix_vectors_data(struct adf_accel_dev *accel_dev)
 	if (!accel_dev->pf.vf_info)
 		msix_num_entries += hw_data->num_banks;

-	irqs = kzalloc_node(msix_num_entries * sizeof(*irqs),
+	irqs = kcalloc_node(msix_num_entries, sizeof(*irqs),
 			    GFP_KERNEL, dev_to_node(&GET_DEV(accel_dev)));
 	if (!irqs)
 		return -ENOMEM;