From patchwork Mon Apr 15 16:35:23 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13630315 Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF9182862 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.182 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713198943; cv=none; b=WNLUbL2jQgC0RxjJeH3OVnVYgbHdm8/D3vWWs3T97VKMBZtZbX/5+SJmUp10ApueASzFz5UPBZ4MPFHCckrRKlzMDq2c27j6xod0Yzk77yod4e5UHLsDxIAVTUdxgaoGxOQ0oAqdT+ccmUeKLcsXqKi+d83iDl7uOqM1/5EYo7A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713198943; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LbN3vPPFFh9Aw4Li7guMwa2zc/mmZK2K8i0/aDCHb3s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nuCkfH1Z5gwaUMrL5OvjY9Z+AImc6GSrJNmvx7o1HG/oHvdCbemMcAGUz5YWHNNVvWblZLQ6Rk/L1ImJzRWBflKWGKdymHs1SdC2abXGjnjnVre9uaRS1RYBGLgvw9ArXbj+Z6DQ+OTVOsQ5ih/HvaMdiIrI1xiztPVKBow72z8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=Y1a8ZueO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="Y1a8ZueO" Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6eff2be3b33so1151200b3a.2 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:35:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1713198941; x=1713803741; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9iXbJH0cVJ4nmmmu00apsXHUH2CgJzw3cA9Huce0b50=; b=Y1a8ZueOfAtDEOoYni87wEliwgVL65NSgwX0GMhMWOHEzm14klTNyAdYIOx1BmeRkx JWdtMoMHHYkmjJdPBdJn9jidutBh0S9/L9fIxrhtupaPKwHZUKCOsEi2oJzxg591rk1z XBZnC2LodvJlGMZhixZJxuONwDz1QCJJPzvsc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713198941; x=1713803741; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9iXbJH0cVJ4nmmmu00apsXHUH2CgJzw3cA9Huce0b50=; b=OaDjimtE8s/GYkBrr0ehpQfcigJbtaqUqFVLDClRZmKQcgXd8Qk1iFFUjTFfUojKg4 A9vNBBEAIWcs9dBKA19UnEPHo5NLECjK8IYy3uZ7cVPjN62BMUWvhC11SyV2qbcFnSG1 7JpaK9BR00+XtCAVgHMvharDxzAXS10OHDsdfGH4509pfYR9eKdRFzw0MhAM3MYl5Suu Oc3PQxCzOszc1jsUepGTuRNVOFeEqz3Gp6Rx/sZMInSt4ANHqYt2lP3zTjAvBsWi7AOR 09v2OZRgsSvZZ+zhvNUmSbLbb/yIvGGM9loCKbFFnxqIEfJkkP4I0BL6FLQedQ4I41bj QzVA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXpdoQ9kHtCvEOLfmPaqE8SC5yoMry0opmawKwbSiAYURvE0wIqNgJ13uDTGSRF8OzYELnuqJsJhIchPZ91lfnsaHFFnw8INDzm5FSBJKJj X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHM8VvFWpbOWi3kh1+acYFf42ZVZPd13a6GBfiv+Ml70g/MFlK MtxhsjdlUm/GDqslLO2lKEOIB+FKdLFH16wMLEf3BoVa0nPsMpkOqoqu68ZWEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEnWFlBUtlHwsk92i90BD+0YVbJMZlklZvuszYn32fReCkIhwN/hdSLkl+zg3BR7klNQ6I0LQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d58b:b0:1e2:1915:2479 with SMTP id k11-20020a170902d58b00b001e219152479mr11022843plh.12.1713198940554; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (15.4.198.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.198.4.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id f12-20020a170902684c00b001e3d2314f3csm8299078pln.141.2024.04.15.09.35.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, jannh@google.com, sroettger@google.com, willy@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com, corbet@lwn.net, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, surenb@google.com, merimus@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pedro.falcato@gmail.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, deraadt@openbsd.org, Jeff Xu Subject: [PATCH v10 4/5] mseal:add documentation Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:35:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20240415163527.626541-5-jeffxu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0.683.g7961c838ac-goog In-Reply-To: <20240415163527.626541-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> References: <20240415163527.626541-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jeff Xu Add documentation for mseal(). Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu --- Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst index afecfe3cc4a8..5926115ec0ed 100644 --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ System calls futex2 ebpf/index ioctl/index + mseal Security-related interfaces =========================== diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4132eec995a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +===================== +Introduction of mseal +===================== + +:Author: Jeff Xu + +Modern CPUs support memory permissions such as RW and NX bits. The memory +permission feature improves security stance on memory corruption bugs, i.e. +the attacker can’t just write to arbitrary memory and point the code to it, +the memory has to be marked with X bit, or else an exception will happen. + +Memory sealing additionally protects the mapping itself against +modifications. This is useful to mitigate memory corruption issues where a +corrupted pointer is passed to a memory management system. For example, +such an attacker primitive can break control-flow integrity guarantees +since read-only memory that is supposed to be trusted can become writable +or .text pages can get remapped. Memory sealing can automatically be +applied by the runtime loader to seal .text and .rodata pages and +applications can additionally seal security critical data at runtime. + +A similar feature already exists in the XNU kernel with the +VM_FLAGS_PERMANENT flag [1] and on OpenBSD with the mimmutable syscall [2]. + +User API +======== +mseal() +----------- +The mseal() syscall has the following signature: + +``int mseal(void addr, size_t len, unsigned long flags)`` + +**addr/len**: virtual memory address range. + +The address range set by ``addr``/``len`` must meet: + - The start address must be in an allocated VMA. + - The start address must be page aligned. + - The end address (``addr`` + ``len``) must be in an allocated VMA. + - no gap (unallocated memory) between start and end address. + +The ``len`` will be paged aligned implicitly by the kernel. + +**flags**: reserved for future use. + +**return values**: + +- ``0``: Success. + +- ``-EINVAL``: + - Invalid input ``flags``. + - The start address (``addr``) is not page aligned. + - Address range (``addr`` + ``len``) overflow. + +- ``-ENOMEM``: + - The start address (``addr``) is not allocated. + - The end address (``addr`` + ``len``) is not allocated. + - A gap (unallocated memory) between start and end address. + +- ``-EPERM``: + - sealing is supported only on 64-bit CPUs, 32-bit is not supported. + +- For above error cases, users can expect the given memory range is + unmodified, i.e. no partial update. + +- There might be other internal errors/cases not listed here, e.g. + error during merging/splitting VMAs, or the process reaching the max + number of supported VMAs. In those cases, partial updates to the given + memory range could happen. However, those cases should be rare. + +**Blocked operations after sealing**: + Unmapping, moving to another location, and shrinking the size, + via munmap() and mremap(), can leave an empty space, therefore + can be replaced with a VMA with a new set of attributes. + + Moving or expanding a different VMA into the current location, + via mremap(). + + Modifying a VMA via mmap(MAP_FIXED). + + Size expansion, via mremap(), does not appear to pose any + specific risks to sealed VMAs. It is included anyway because + the use case is unclear. In any case, users can rely on + merging to expand a sealed VMA. + + mprotect() and pkey_mprotect(). + + Some destructive madvice() behaviors (e.g. MADV_DONTNEED) + for anonymous memory, when users don't have write permission to the + memory. Those behaviors can alter region contents by discarding pages, + effectively a memset(0) for anonymous memory. + + Kernel will return -EPERM for blocked operations. + + For blocked operations, one can expect the given address is unmodified, + i.e. no partial update. Note, this is different from existing mm + system call behaviors, where partial updates are made till an error is + found and returned to userspace. To give an example: + + Assume following code sequence: + + - ptr = mmap(null, 8192, PROT_NONE); + - munmap(ptr + 4096, 4096); + - ret1 = mprotect(ptr, 8192, PROT_READ); + - mseal(ptr, 4096); + - ret2 = mprotect(ptr, 8192, PROT_NONE); + + ret1 will be -ENOMEM, the page from ptr is updated to PROT_READ. + + ret2 will be -EPERM, the page remains to be PROT_READ. + +**Note**: + +- mseal() only works on 64-bit CPUs, not 32-bit CPU. + +- users can call mseal() multiple times, mseal() on an already sealed memory + is a no-action (not error). + +- munseal() is not supported. + +Use cases: +========== +- glibc: + The dynamic linker, during loading ELF executables, can apply sealing to + non-writable memory segments. + +- Chrome browser: protect some security sensitive data-structures. + +Notes on which memory to seal: +============================== + +It might be important to note that sealing changes the lifetime of a mapping, +i.e. the sealed mapping won’t be unmapped till the process terminates or the +exec system call is invoked. Applications can apply sealing to any virtual +memory region from userspace, but it is crucial to thoroughly analyze the +mapping's lifetime prior to apply the sealing. + +For example: + +- aio/shm + + aio/shm can call mmap()/munmap() on behalf of userspace, e.g. ksys_shmdt() in + shm.c. The lifetime of those mapping are not tied to the lifetime of the + process. If those memories are sealed from userspace, then munmap() will fail, + causing leaks in VMA address space during the lifetime of the process. + +- Brk (heap) + + Currently, userspace applications can seal parts of the heap by calling + malloc() and mseal(). + let's assume following calls from user space: + + - ptr = malloc(size); + - mprotect(ptr, size, RO); + - mseal(ptr, size); + - free(ptr); + + Technically, before mseal() is added, the user can change the protection of + the heap by calling mprotect(RO). As long as the user changes the protection + back to RW before free(), the memory range can be reused. + + Adding mseal() into the picture, however, the heap is then sealed partially, + the user can still free it, but the memory remains to be RO. If the address + is re-used by the heap manager for another malloc, the process might crash + soon after. Therefore, it is important not to apply sealing to any memory + that might get recycled. + + Furthermore, even if the application never calls the free() for the ptr, + the heap manager may invoke the brk system call to shrink the size of the + heap. In the kernel, the brk-shrink will call munmap(). Consequently, + depending on the location of the ptr, the outcome of brk-shrink is + nondeterministic. + + +Additional notes: +================= +As Jann Horn pointed out in [3], there are still a few ways to write +to RO memory, which is, in a way, by design. Those cases are not covered +by mseal(). If applications want to block such cases, sandbox tools (such as +seccomp, LSM, etc) might be considered. + +Those cases are: + +- Write to read-only memory through /proc/self/mem interface. +- Write to read-only memory through ptrace (such as PTRACE_POKETEXT). +- userfaultfd. + +The idea that inspired this patch comes from Stephen Röttger’s work in V8 +CFI [4]. Chrome browser in ChromeOS will be the first user of this API. + +Reference: +========== +[1] https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/blob/1031c584a5e37aff177559b9f69dbd3c8c3fd30a/osfmk/mach/vm_statistics.h#L274 + +[2] https://man.openbsd.org/mimmutable.2 + +[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez3ShUYey+ZAFsU2i1RpQn0a5eOs2hzQ426FkcgnfUGLvA@mail.gmail.com + +[4] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O2jwK4dxI3nRcOJuPYkonhTkNQfbmwdvxQMyXgeaRHo/edit#heading=h.bvaojj9fu6hc