@@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ static inline const char *str_enable_disable(bool v)
{
return v ? "enable" : "disable";
}
+#define str_disable_enable(v) str_enable_disable(!(v))
static inline const char *str_enabled_disabled(bool v)
{
return v ? "enabled" : "disabled";
}
+#define str_disabled_enabled(v) str_enabled_disabled(!(v))
static inline const char *str_hi_lo(bool v)
{
@@ -36,11 +38,13 @@ static inline const char *str_on_off(bool v)
{
return v ? "on" : "off";
}
+#define str_off_on(v) str_on_off(!(v))
static inline const char *str_yes_no(bool v)
{
return v ? "yes" : "no";
}
+#define str_no_yes(v) str_yes_no(!(v))
static inline const char *str_true_false(bool v)
{
Similar to the exists helper: str_enable_disable/ str_enabled_disabled/str_on_off/str_yes_no helpers, we can add the opposite helpers. That's str_disable_enable, str_disabled_enabled, str_off_on and str_no_yes. There are more than 10 cases currently (expect str_disable_enable now has 3 use cases) exist in the code can be replaced with these helper. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com> --- include/linux/string_choices.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)