Message ID | 9bd4775fe9c88b33c3194f841a2ec2f559d58032.1668814746.git.gustavoars@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | scsi: qla2xxx: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member | expand |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 05:47:56PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Prefer struct_size() over open-coded versions of idiom: > > sizeof(struct-with-flex-array) + sizeof(typeof-flex-array-elements) * count > > where count is the max number of items the flexible array is supposed to > contain. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > index 69d3bc795f90..27e1df56b0fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > @@ -4072,9 +4072,8 @@ int qla24xx_async_gpnft(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, u8 fc4_type, srb_t *sp) > } > sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size = GPN_FT_REQ_SIZE; > > - rspsz = sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp) + > - (vha->hw->max_fibre_devices * > - sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data)); > + rspsz = struct_size((struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp *)0, entries, > + vha->hw->max_fibre_devices); This should be able to use sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp instead of the explicit struct with a NULL. (It's just using typeof() internally, so it's okay that it isn't allocated yet.) -Kees > > sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp = dma_alloc_coherent(&vha->hw->pdev->dev, > rspsz, > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:10:44PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 05:47:56PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Prefer struct_size() over open-coded versions of idiom: > > > > sizeof(struct-with-flex-array) + sizeof(typeof-flex-array-elements) * count > > > > where count is the max number of items the flexible array is supposed to > > contain. > > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c | 5 ++--- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > > index 69d3bc795f90..27e1df56b0fb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > > @@ -4072,9 +4072,8 @@ int qla24xx_async_gpnft(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, u8 fc4_type, srb_t *sp) > > } > > sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size = GPN_FT_REQ_SIZE; > > > > - rspsz = sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp) + > > - (vha->hw->max_fibre_devices * > > - sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data)); > > + rspsz = struct_size((struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp *)0, entries, > > + vha->hw->max_fibre_devices); > > This should be able to use sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp instead of the > explicit struct with a NULL. (It's just using typeof() internally, so > it's okay that it isn't allocated yet.) mmh... yeah; and considering they're already going all the way down to sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size, I think accessing sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp is perfectly fine. :) I'll respin. Thanks for the feedback! -- Gustavo > > -Kees > > > > > sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp = dma_alloc_coherent(&vha->hw->pdev->dev, > > rspsz, > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > -- > Kees Cook
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 01:20:09AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:10:44PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 05:47:56PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > Prefer struct_size() over open-coded versions of idiom: > > > > > > sizeof(struct-with-flex-array) + sizeof(typeof-flex-array-elements) * count > > > > > > where count is the max number of items the flexible array is supposed to > > > contain. > > > > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c | 5 ++--- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > > > index 69d3bc795f90..27e1df56b0fb 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c > > > @@ -4072,9 +4072,8 @@ int qla24xx_async_gpnft(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, u8 fc4_type, srb_t *sp) > > > } > > > sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size = GPN_FT_REQ_SIZE; > > > > > > - rspsz = sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp) + > > > - (vha->hw->max_fibre_devices * > > > - sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data)); > > > + rspsz = struct_size((struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp *)0, entries, > > > + vha->hw->max_fibre_devices); > > > > This should be able to use sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp instead of the > > explicit struct with a NULL. (It's just using typeof() internally, so > > it's okay that it isn't allocated yet.) > > mmh... yeah; and considering they're already going all the way down to > sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size, I think accessing sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp > is perfectly fine. :) except that... it seems sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp is a pointer to void and not a struct of type struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp. :O drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h:474: struct ct_arg { void *iocb; u16 nport_handle; dma_addr_t req_dma; dma_addr_t rsp_dma; u32 req_size; u32 rsp_size; u32 req_allocated_size; u32 rsp_allocated_size; void *req; void *rsp; port_id_t id; }; I wonder if you wanted to point out something entirely different...? -- Gustavo
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c index 69d3bc795f90..27e1df56b0fb 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c @@ -4072,9 +4072,8 @@ int qla24xx_async_gpnft(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, u8 fc4_type, srb_t *sp) } sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size = GPN_FT_REQ_SIZE; - rspsz = sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp) + - (vha->hw->max_fibre_devices * - sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data)); + rspsz = struct_size((struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp *)0, entries, + vha->hw->max_fibre_devices); sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp = dma_alloc_coherent(&vha->hw->pdev->dev, rspsz,
Prefer struct_size() over open-coded versions of idiom: sizeof(struct-with-flex-array) + sizeof(typeof-flex-array-elements) * count where count is the max number of items the flexible array is supposed to contain. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)