[v5,11/32] x86/dumpstack: Try harder to get a call trace on stack overflow

Commit Message

Andy Lutomirski July 11, 2016, 8:53 p.m. UTC

If we overflow the stack, print_context_stack will abort.  Detect
this case and rewind back into the valid part of the stack so that
we can trace it.

Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 4eefee06f6fd..de8242d8bb61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@  static inline int valid_stack_ptr(struct task_struct *task,
 		else
 			return 0;
 	}
-	return p > t && p < t + THREAD_SIZE - size;
+	return p >= t && p < t + THREAD_SIZE - size;
 }
 
 unsigned long
@@ -98,6 +98,14 @@  print_context_stack(struct task_struct *task,
 {
 	struct stack_frame *frame = (struct stack_frame *)bp;
 
+	/*
+	 * If we overflowed the stack into a guard page, jump back to the
+	 * bottom of the usable stack.
+	 */
+	if ((unsigned long)task_stack_page(task) - (unsigned long)stack <
+	    PAGE_SIZE)
+		stack = (unsigned long *)task_stack_page(task);
+
 	while (valid_stack_ptr(task, stack, sizeof(*stack), end)) {
 		unsigned long addr;