From patchwork Fri Dec 20 21:36:55 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sohil Mehta X-Patchwork-Id: 13917458 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0924C21B1AA; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734730757; cv=none; b=ejRoIWFSRXQ3FxAoFXf0o/buc7sZVRkLT9Dc+kCKlsUo6POXC1+8R2p1lnrZjHDanafWBmSxbVcI/kUUs3+ozMzp05Xr1ulEVtGeIQSwPHNXXabJmUSKH5d2zjQHmuw7+9gAu10XR4z9CTmrKvBaT9oAUcw5wmY6Ocw5KrOTgpI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734730757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ljLmLUYUgAtyG8G99rXQ56EnVq57jHlL/48SlXuyQx8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=L45coFB73dIVB9/ubllCuzdvMyN3z2oenLn4oHEEkyrzYWxPlfWZ+hTPngFTJ/GAKsnxmdhug/ZgnKKSsgcPFo5iR9kH/OM1R1kBFU3BJev9YpLK9bBAGXfuMaVzFvHVi6M68cN/361bAYib2kBI+N3GOllD0dZOB5ejrPOw7fg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=etc0qJCb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="etc0qJCb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1734730755; x=1766266755; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=ljLmLUYUgAtyG8G99rXQ56EnVq57jHlL/48SlXuyQx8=; b=etc0qJCbM07ulH1SckiQd3qdHh7yEzS3lZ56NJI3kh66Mb9YcFfrNSyV UZ7USRJoUB+y//5BkkWetrYb9WyCV4mUMT5VJfnCImSc/3h64gogCrPRU oQJejHGkozBMx8UJS/eYZ2NDlq1WWtEvaWDCjUpCE5mxlF9FLFB4i2ozO fwYInB+LHUmv+/xNhnBnY8h2HnWDke7iQBLOzeXHX63jqHgtiny5WbIy5 7kFDUbjaJSDRyqD1eBSsx1RVwqUBdA1Al7x+DpyC4CdJpQAS9/F0Bt/Pq eLuXvZd4D5jxJNJNgfXVkWSySWev/JmCzg0tcefzUr6WjECDWGDuZX3/m g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dT1itH73TceykF5ctGYo4Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HbrG41DnS2CZd7Jvk2/AIg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11292"; a="39070605" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,251,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="39070605" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2024 13:39:15 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zGmtfSqqRfet1r1cH5PXsA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: k6lZbLLKSDqRmHNbYha0jA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="103223822" Received: from sohilmeh.sc.intel.com ([172.25.103.65]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2024 13:39:13 -0800 From: Sohil Mehta To: x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Tony Luck Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Andy Lutomirski , Viresh Kumar , Fenghua Yu , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Sohil Mehta , Zhang Rui , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Prepare for new Intel family models Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:36:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20241220213711.1892696-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 ---Tl;Dr--- Audit all the Intel family model checks to get ready for the upcoming family 18 and 19 models. Patches 1-5: Fixes in arch/x86 and drivers Patches 6-15: Cleanups in arch/x86 to convert x86_model checks to VFM ones. This series does not include cleanups in drivers/ ---Background--- Mainstream Intel processors have been using family number 6 for a couple of decades. The last deviation from this were the Netburst architecture based Pentium 4s that had a family number of 15. Intel has recently started to introduce extended family numbers greater than 15 [1]. Though newer CPUs can have any family number, the currently planned CPUs lie in families 18 and 19. Some kernel code assumes that the family number would always remain 6. There are checks that apply to recent family 6 models such as Lunar Lake and Clearwater Forest but don't automatically extend to family 19 models such as Diamond Rapids. This series aims to fix and cleanup all of such Intel specific checks (mainly in arch/x86) to avoid such issues in the future. It also converts almost all of the x86_model checks in arch/x86 to the new VFM ones. OTOH, x86_model usage in drivers/ is a huge mess. Some drivers might need to be completely rewritten to make them future proof. I have attempted a couple of fixes in cpufreq and hwmon but I am uncertain of their efficacy. A more thorough clean up of drivers is needed to replace all x86_model usage with the new VFM checks. ---Assumptions and Trade-offs--- Newer CPUs will have model numbers only in family 6 or after family 15. No new processors would be added between family 6 and 15. There are a couple of related quirks that have been described below. As a convention, Intel family numbers are referenced using decimals (family 15, 19, etc.) even though the AMD specific code might prefer hexadecimals in similar situations. It would be preferable to have simpler and more maintainable checks that might in a rare situation change the behavior on really old platforms. If someone pops up with an issue, the code would be fixed later. For example, the check, c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO is preferred over, c->x86 == 6 || c->x86 > 15 if the likelihood of adversely affecting family 15 is low. Also, the CPU defines in intel-family.h have been added as and when needed to make reviewing and applying patches out of order easier. Please let me know if it would be preferable to add all the defines in a single patch at the beginning. ---Noteworthy quirks--- Pentium II Overdrive - A unique family number: Wikipedia says[2], In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, the Pentium II OverDrive CPU identifies itself as family 6, model 3, though this is misleading, as it is not based on the family 6/model 3 Klamath core. As mentioned in the Pentium II Processor update documentation from Intel, "although this processor has a CPUID of 163xh, it uses a Pentium II processor CPUID 065xh processor core." A dump of the microcode file 06-03-02 shows: 001/001: sig 0x00001632, pf_mask 0x00, 1998-06-10, rev 0x0002, size 2048 An archived CPUID dump [3] also says: CPUID 00000001: 00001632-00000000-00000000-0183FBFF That would translate to a family number of 22 (0x16). This aberration is not explicitly handled anywhere in the kernel so the platform might already be broken. This series might make it worse for the platform if the latest kernel works on it by chance. Xeon Phi coprocessors: The first couple of Knights line of products (Knights Ferry and Knights Corner) have a family number of 11. But they were released purely as coprocessors and would not directly boot mainline Linux. The later versions Knights Landing and Knights Mill could act as a host processor but they used family number 6. So, the changes in this series should not affect any of these platforms. ---Links--- [1]: commit d1fb034b75a8 ("x86/cpu: Add two Intel CPU model numbers") [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_II#Pentium_II_OverDrive [3]: https://github.com/InstLatx64/InstLatx64/blob/master/GenuineIntel/GenuineIntel0000632_P2OD_CPUID.txt The series has only been lightly tested on a couple of family 6 systems. Planning to test it on more systems in the future. Any testing on legacy platforms would be greatly helpful. Many thanks to Tony and Dave for guiding me through this historical maze. Sohil Mehta (15): x86/apic: Fix 32-bit APIC initialization for extended Intel families x86/apic: Fix smp init delay for extended Intel families x86/cpu/intel: Fix init_intel() checks for extended family numbers cpufreq: Fix the efficient idle check for Intel extended families hwmon: Fix Intel family checks to include extended family numbers x86/microcode: Update the Intel processor flag scan check x86/mtrr: Modify a x86_model check to an Intel VFM check x86/cpu/intel: Replace early family 6 checks with VFM ones x86/cpu/intel: Replace family 15 checks with VFM ones x86/cpu/intel: Replace family 5 model checks with VFM ones x86/pat: Replace Intel model checks with VFM ones x86/acpi/cstate: Improve Intel family model checks x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc model checks perf/x86: Simplify p6_pmu_init() perf/x86/p4: Replace Pentium 4 model checks with VFM ones arch/x86/events/intel/p4.c | 7 ++-- arch/x86/events/intel/p6.c | 28 ++++--------- arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 16 ++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 8 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 4 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 58 ++++++++++++--------------- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 3 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c | 4 +- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 8 ++-- arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c | 7 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 13 +++--- drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 26 ++++++++---- 12 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) base-commit: 78d4f34e2115b517bcbfe7ec0d018bbbb6f9b0b8