From patchwork Fri Jul 28 12:13:13 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Gleixner X-Patchwork-Id: 13331810 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016B3C001DE for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236349AbjG1MPm (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:15:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236409AbjG1MOU (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:14:20 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F208449C; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 05:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20230728120931.061954955@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1690546393; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=K8G3BegNCqpNmXITgAr+wce0GBx04jSPNL1AU9AAQFg=; b=ZmfO0ZG85nF2KpiFv7XwqajVJe9Muy6CaGajI9VAfA1GZjUwtnMvMGpQVF2VCKJ/oMXvmZ vgxdQsPyqLpRzoC8+xI8J0Fyly2TaRdcbmJVVSF2mpHLNw3lZDMKfGL1qvaJzgkfmYiBik wo4EWqDisK5dss2o6fkLLMLFZLGiqtYfVS9nGXoFpjlUwfhSxmiWDuZDLqgq710AL8KXKv e8ntog7V9iYpU/k8cw3WENDKNWMecL5Y4PxpZHpLvv8Tzu/p/MML8AnWAIBCmdpAyJyM9T DGA3R6BeFyDPRgNs5c2xgtdvNwPssStIYMfFow7P0h3meq/Wh2eV9EZ/ULvMow== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1690546394; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: references:references; bh=K8G3BegNCqpNmXITgAr+wce0GBx04jSPNL1AU9AAQFg=; b=JzUXj7G04RfjLgdBdsYnKFK2gxODl0kiyFsYPQP0BBIi28zDY0//K8fIIVTk+Fr4uhRHz6 Mmvz2u0bgvTzRRAw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Andrew Cooper , Arjan van de Ven , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Dick Kennedy , James Smart , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Huang Rui , Juergen Gross , Steve Wahl , Mike Travis , Dimitri Sivanich , Russ Anderson Subject: [patch v2 25/38] x86/cpu: Provide a sane leaf 0xb/0x1f parser References: <20230728105650.565799744@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org detect_extended_topology() along with it's early() variant is a classic example for duct tape engineering: - It evaluates an array of subleafs with a boatload of local variables for the relevant topology levels instead of using an array to save the enumerated information and propagate it to the right level - It has no boundary checks for subleafs - It prevents updating the die_id with a crude workaround instead of checking for leaf 0xb which does not provide die information. - It's broken vs. the number of dies evaluation as it uses: num_processors[DIE_LEVEL] / num_processors[CORE_LEVEL] which "works" only correctly if there is none of the intermediate topology levels (MODULE/TILE) enumerated. There is zero value in trying to "fix" that code as the only proper fix is to rewrite it from scratch. Implement a sane parser with proper code documentation, which will be used for the consolidated topology evaluation in the next step. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- V2: Fixed up the comment alignment for registers - Peterz --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 2 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.h | 12 +++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_ext.c | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ KMSAN_SANITIZE_common.o := n KCSAN_SANITIZE_common.o := n obj-y := cacheinfo.o scattered.o -obj-y += topology_common.o topology.o +obj-y += topology_common.o topology_ext.o topology.o obj-y += common.o obj-y += rdrand.o obj-y += match.o --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.h @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ void cpu_init_topology(struct cpuinfo_x8 void cpu_parse_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); void topology_set_dom(struct topo_scan *tscan, enum x86_topology_domains dom, unsigned int shift, unsigned int ncpus); +bool cpu_parse_topology_ext(struct topo_scan *tscan); static inline u32 topo_shift_apicid(u32 apicid, enum x86_topology_domains dom) { @@ -31,4 +32,15 @@ static inline u32 topo_relative_domain_i return apicid & (x86_topo_system.dom_size[dom] - 1); } +/* + * Update a domain level after the fact without propagating. Used to fixup + * broken CPUID enumerations. + */ +static inline void topology_update_dom(struct topo_scan *tscan, enum x86_topology_domains dom, + unsigned int shift, unsigned int ncpus) +{ + tscan->dom_shifts[dom] = shift; + tscan->dom_ncpus[dom] = ncpus; +} + #endif /* ARCH_X86_TOPOLOGY_H */ --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_ext.c @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include + +#include +#include +#include + +#include "cpu.h" + +enum topo_types { + INVALID_TYPE = 0, + SMT_TYPE = 1, + CORE_TYPE = 2, + MODULE_TYPE = 3, + TILE_TYPE = 4, + DIE_TYPE = 5, + DIEGRP_TYPE = 6, + MAX_TYPE = 7, +}; + +/* + * Use a lookup table for the case that there are future types > 6 which + * describe an intermediate domain level which does not exist today. + * + * A table will also be handy to parse the new AMD 0x80000026 leaf which + * has defined different domain types, but otherwise uses the same layout + * with some of the reserved bits used for new information. + */ +static const unsigned int topo_domain_map[MAX_TYPE] = { + [SMT_TYPE] = TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, + [CORE_TYPE] = TOPO_CORE_DOMAIN, + [MODULE_TYPE] = TOPO_MODULE_DOMAIN, + [TILE_TYPE] = TOPO_TILE_DOMAIN, + [DIE_TYPE] = TOPO_DIE_DOMAIN, + [DIEGRP_TYPE] = TOPO_PKG_DOMAIN, +}; + +static inline bool topo_subleaf(struct topo_scan *tscan, u32 leaf, u32 subleaf) +{ + unsigned int dom, maxtype = leaf == 0xb ? CORE_TYPE + 1 : MAX_TYPE; + struct { + // eax + u32 x2apic_shift : 5, // Number of bits to shift APIC ID right + // for the topology ID at the next level + __rsvd0 : 27; // Reserved + // ebx + u32 num_processors : 16, // Number of processors at current level + __rsvd1 : 16; // Reserved + // ecx + u32 level : 8, // Current topology level. Same as sub leaf number + type : 8, // Level type. If 0, invalid + __rsvd2 : 16; // Reserved + // edx + u32 x2apic_id : 32; // X2APIC ID of the current logical processor + } sl; + + cpuid_subleaf(leaf, subleaf, &sl); + + if (!sl.num_processors || sl.type == INVALID_TYPE) + return false; + + if (sl.type >= maxtype) { + /* + * As the subleafs are ordered in domain level order, this + * could be recovered in theory by propagating the + * information at the last parsed level. + * + * But if the infinite wisdom of hardware folks decides to + * create a new domain type between CORE and MODULE or DIE + * and DIEGRP, then that would overwrite the CORE or DIE + * information. + * + * It really would have been too obvious to make the domain + * type space sparse and leave a few reserved types between + * the points which might change instead of forcing + * software to either create a monstrosity of workarounds + * or just being up the creek without a paddle. + * + * Refuse to implement monstrosity, emit an error and try + * to survive. + */ + pr_err_once("Topology: leaf 0x%x:%d Unknown domain type %u\n", + leaf, subleaf, sl.type); + return true; + } + + dom = topo_domain_map[sl.type]; + if (!dom) { + tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid = sl.x2apic_id; + } else if (tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid != sl.x2apic_id) { + pr_warn_once(FW_BUG "CPUID leaf 0x%x subleaf %d APIC ID mismatch %x != %x\n", + leaf, subleaf, tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid, sl.x2apic_id); + } + + topology_set_dom(tscan, dom, sl.x2apic_shift, sl.num_processors); + return true; +} + +static bool parse_topology_leaf(struct topo_scan *tscan, u32 leaf) +{ + u32 subleaf; + + if (tscan->c->cpuid_level < leaf) + return false; + + /* Read all available subleafs and populate the levels */ + for (subleaf = 0; topo_subleaf(tscan, leaf, subleaf); subleaf++); + + /* If subleaf 0 failed to parse, give up */ + if (!subleaf) + return false; + + /* + * There are machines in the wild which have shift 0 in the subleaf + * 0, but advertise 2 logical processors at that level. They are + * truly SMT. + */ + if (!tscan->dom_shifts[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN] && tscan->dom_ncpus[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN] > 1) { + unsigned int sft = get_count_order(tscan->dom_ncpus[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN]); + + pr_warn_once(FW_BUG "CPUID leaf 0x%x subleaf 0 has shift level 0 but %u CPUs\n", + leaf, tscan->dom_ncpus[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN]); + topology_update_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, sft, tscan->dom_ncpus[TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN]); + } + + set_cpu_cap(tscan->c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY); + return true; +} + +bool cpu_parse_topology_ext(struct topo_scan *tscan) +{ + /* Try lead 0x1F first. If not available try leaf 0x0b */ + if (parse_topology_leaf(tscan, 0x1f)) + return true; + return parse_topology_leaf(tscan, 0x0b); +}