Message ID | 20200607155408.958437-1-jic23@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=4zHB=7U=vger.kernel.org=linux-iio-owner@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AC913 for <patchwork-linux-iio@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8D620748 for <patchwork-linux-iio@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:56:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591545376; bh=6E9c0gJRsoUnfcb8GNchckcf149+UtNjaCv4aOE68FM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=Eypfb/07rAkTK9Rwh85O2GVQKJTzmhAbZg5Xh6MbUFvYPArA+Gb1irU3URN/K1xlv 6ebY6Egb8dUjQ93axt8cRuQ5g7hKuvGilvg/K8VQIt+L6S+Rsg9ub+7rWLU0x8jhm2 OzO0jFCk3Wh/q1oi4/3FZpObrAJxsfXX94ZD0/GE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726658AbgFGP4Q (ORCPT <rfc822;patchwork-linux-iio@patchwork.kernel.org>); Sun, 7 Jun 2020 11:56:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57176 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726631AbgFGP4P (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 7 Jun 2020 11:56:15 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpc149474-cmbg20-2-0-cust94.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.4.196.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2276E20659; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:56:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591545374; bh=6E9c0gJRsoUnfcb8GNchckcf149+UtNjaCv4aOE68FM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=SG2KYtfe5mmeahWjRkFqk++OCgplymSXc4EIoAOkrnnJ5NVaTMF4dxF185teIhitS 3xoOe3rQ3HVcbdiRpHV5sFqSxBtxqQF27lfTeIIHlfLCdgL1tGcuZk3rAgtOZWyzo6 YWY/adnhT5AhBFYJKppoxI11Ye7xrbFk9vXt5aYc= From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 00/32] IIO: Fused set 1 and 2 of timestamp alignment fixes Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:53:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20200607155408.958437-1-jic23@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-iio.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
IIO: Fused set 1 and 2 of timestamp alignment fixes
|
expand
|
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> There are still a few more drivers to do after this, but this set with the remains of the original series 1 and 2 is big enough to keep us busy for now! Note checkpatch really doesn't like cases of __aligned(8) as it thinks they are an extern in a c file for some reason. A few notes based on questions on v1. 1. Why not use put_unaligned to avoid the whole thing? This interface can pass directly to a variety of in kernel users who would reasonably assume that we have true natural alignment. When it gets passed directly is subtle as it depends on whether the demux has to realign the data or not. So enabling an extra channel could result in a previously working alignment no longer being true. Even if this is fine for existing usecases we are likely to store up subtle long term issues if we don't fix it explicitly. It's also worth noting that the data channel sometimes suffered the same problem as the timestamp. 2. Why not specify explicit padding? In my view this is error prone in comparisom with relying on c to do the hard work for us. 3. Why not move the timestamp to the start? ABI breakage and as timestamp is optional (no obvious from the iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp call) we can end up having to shift the rest of the data within that call. Changes since v1. Andy Schevchenko pointed out that on x86_32 s64 elements are only aligned to 4 bytes. Where I had tried to use a structure to avoid explicit need to list the padding, there were some cases where this results in insufficient padding being inserted. This doesn't affect the few patches that had already been applied and sent upstream. (which was lucky ;) The fix was to take advantage of __aligned(8) which (according to my reading of the c spec and the gcc docs) enforces the alignment of both the element within a structure and the structure itself. The kernel now requires a recent enough version of GCC to ensure this works both on the stack and heap. This is done in lots of other userspace interfaces. In some cases iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts is aligning data for passing to userspace, be it via a kfifo so it is sensible we should use the same solution. Note that we could have used u64_aligned but there is no equivalent for s64 and explicit use of __aligned(8) is common in the kernel so we adopt this here. Note that there were about 8 drivers that would have been broken with v1 of the patch. I have also forced alignment of timestamps in cases where (mostly by coincidence) we would have been fine (padding was less than 4 bytes anyway. I did this partly to reduce fragility if other elements are added in future and also to avoid cut and paste errors in new drivers. There were a few other minor tidying up changes inline with reviews of v1. I've kept tags given for v1 on basis the changes are minor. Shout if you disagree. Version 1 part 1 cover letter. Lars noted in a recent review [1] of the adis16475 that we had an issue around the alignment requirements of iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp. Whilst it's not documented, that function assumes that the overall buffer is 8 byte aligned, to ensure the timestamp is itself naturally aligned. We have drivers that use arrays (typically on the stack) that do not guarantee this alignment. We could have fixed this by using a put_unaligned to write the timestamp but I think that just pushes the problem down the line. If we were to have a consumer buffer wanting all the channels in the current active_scanmask then it will get the raw buffer from the driver passed straight through. It seems odd to me if we allow passing a buffer that is not naturally aligned through to a consumer. Hence I'm proposing to fix up all existing drivers that might pass a buffer with insufficient alignment guarantees. Sometimes the timestamp is guaranteed to be in a particular location, in which case we can use C structure alignment guarantees to fix this in a nice readable fashion. In other cases, the timestamp location depends on which channels are enabled, and in those case we can use explicit alignment __aligned(8) to ensure the whole array is appropriately aligned. Lars-Peter also noted that, in many of these cases, there are holes in the stack array that we never write. Those provide a potential leak of kernel data to userspace. For drivers where this applies we either need to zero those holes each time, or allocate the buffer on the heap (only once), ensuring it is zeroed at that time. We may leak previous values from the sensor but currently that seems unlikely to present any form of security risk. As such, this first set contains a mixture of fixes. Where there are no possible holes, the buffer is kept on the stack but a c structure is used to guarantee appropriate alignment. Where there are holes, the buffer is moved into the iio_priv() accessed data private structure. A c structure or __aligned(8) is used as appropriate. I've stopped at this point rather than doing all the drivers Lars found in order to both throttle the review burden and also to see find any general problems with the fixes before doign futher similar series. A few of the remaining ones will be rather more complex to deal with. These have been there a long time, so whilst they are fixes we will want in stable I'm not that bothered if it takes us a little while to get them there! [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg350590.html [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11554215/ Jonathan Cameron (32): iio: accel: kxsd9: Fix alignment of local buffer. iio:accel:mma8452: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:accel:bmc150-accel: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:accel:mma7455: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:gyro:itg3200: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:proximity:mb1232: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:chemical:ccs811: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:light:si1145: Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:light:max44000 Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:light:rpr0521 Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:light:st_uvis25 Fix timestamp alignment and prevent data leak. iio:light:ltr501 Fix timestamp alignment issue. iio:magnetometer:ak8974: Fix alignment and data leak issues iio:magnetometer:ak8975 Fix alignment and data leak issues. iio:magnetometer:mag3110 Fix alignment and data leak issues. iio:humidity:hdc100x Fix alignment and data leak issues iio:humidity:hts221 Fix alignment and data leak issues iio:imu:bmi160 Fix alignment and data leak issues iio:imu:st_lsm6dsx Fix alignment and data leak issues iio:imu:inv_mpu6050 Fix dma and ts alignment and data leak issues. iio:pressure:ms5611 Fix buffer element alignment iio:pressure:mpl3115 Force alignment of buffer iio:adc:ti-adc081c Fix alignment and data leak issues iio:adc:ti-adc084s021 Fix alignment and data leak issues. iio:adc:ti-adc084s021 Tidy up endian types iio:adc:ti-ads1015 Fix buffer element alignment iio:adc:ti-ads124s08 Fix alignment and data leak issues. iio:adc:ti-ads8688 Fix alignment and potential data leak issue iio:adc:ti-adc0832 Fix alignment issue with timestamp iio:adc:ti-adc12138 Fix alignment issue with timestamp iio:adc:ina2xx Fix timestamp alignment issue. iio:adc:max1118 Fix alignment of timestamp and data leak issues drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c | 15 ++++++-- drivers/iio/accel/kxsd9.c | 16 ++++++--- drivers/iio/accel/mma7455_core.c | 16 ++++++--- drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 11 ++++-- drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 8 ++--- drivers/iio/adc/max1118.c | 10 ++++-- drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc081c.c | 11 ++++-- drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc0832.c | 7 ++-- drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc084s021.c | 20 ++++++----- drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc12138.c | 9 ++--- drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c | 12 ++++--- drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads124s08.c | 10 ++++-- drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads8688.c | 12 +++++-- drivers/iio/chemical/ccs811.c | 13 ++++--- drivers/iio/gyro/itg3200_buffer.c | 15 +++++--- drivers/iio/humidity/hdc100x.c | 10 ++++-- drivers/iio/humidity/hts221.h | 7 ++-- drivers/iio/humidity/hts221_buffer.c | 9 ++--- drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160.h | 2 ++ drivers/iio/imu/bmi160/bmi160_core.c | 5 ++- drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h | 8 +++-- drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 12 +++---- drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h | 5 +++ .../iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 36 ++++++++++--------- drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 15 ++++---- drivers/iio/light/max44000.c | 12 ++++--- drivers/iio/light/rpr0521.c | 17 ++++++--- drivers/iio/light/si1145.c | 7 ++-- drivers/iio/light/st_uvis25.h | 5 +++ drivers/iio/light/st_uvis25_core.c | 6 ++-- drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8974.c | 10 ++++-- drivers/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.c | 20 +++++++---- drivers/iio/magnetometer/mag3110.c | 13 ++++--- drivers/iio/pressure/mpl3115.c | 3 +- drivers/iio/pressure/ms5611_core.c | 11 ++++-- drivers/iio/proximity/mb1232.c | 17 ++++----- 36 files changed, 275 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)