Message ID | 20220722130726.7627-1-marcus.folkesson@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Improve MCP3911 driver | expand |
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:07:17 +0200 Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series intend to fix bugs and improve functionality of the > MCP3911 driver. > The main features added are > - Support for buffers > - Interrupt driven readings > - Support for oversampling ratio > - Support for set scale values (Gain) > > Among the bug fixes, there are changes in the formula for calculate raw > value and a fix for mismatch in the devicetree property. > > Another general improvement for the driver is to use managed resources > for all allocated resources. > Hi Marcus, The first 3 fixes look good to me. Do you want me to pick those up to go in after rc1 via my togreg-fixes branch? The side effect of doing that is it'll be a little while before they are upstream in the branch I'll want to pick the rest of the series on top of. So it's a trade off between getting fixes in as soon as possible and slowing down other improvements a little. Jonathan > General changes for the series: > > v3: > - Drop Phase patch > - Add Fixes tags for those patches that are fixes > - Move Fixes patches to the beginning of the patchset > > v4: > - Split up devm-cleanup functions > - Cosmetic cleanups > - Add > select IIO_BUFFER > select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER > To Kconfig > - Add .endianness = IIO_BE > > > Best regards, > Marcus Folkesson > > >
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:07:17 +0200 > Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This patch series intend to fix bugs and improve functionality of the > > MCP3911 driver. > > The main features added are > > - Support for buffers > > - Interrupt driven readings > > - Support for oversampling ratio > > - Support for set scale values (Gain) > > > > Among the bug fixes, there are changes in the formula for calculate raw > > value and a fix for mismatch in the devicetree property. > > > > Another general improvement for the driver is to use managed resources > > for all allocated resources. > > > Hi Marcus, > > The first 3 fixes look good to me. Do you want me to pick those up to > go in after rc1 via my togreg-fixes branch? The side effect of doing > that is it'll be a little while before they are upstream in the branch > I'll want to pick the rest of the series on top of. > > So it's a trade off between getting fixes in as soon as possible and > slowing down other improvements a little. Both ways works for me. I guess it is preferable to get the fixes in as soon as possible? If so, do you want me to rebase the series on your togreg-fixes branch or wait to send v5 until the patches are upstream? Or simply keep sending the whole series? Thanks, Marcus Folkesson > > Jonathan >
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:45:07 +0200 Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:07:17 +0200 > > Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This patch series intend to fix bugs and improve functionality of the > > > MCP3911 driver. > > > The main features added are > > > - Support for buffers > > > - Interrupt driven readings > > > - Support for oversampling ratio > > > - Support for set scale values (Gain) > > > > > > Among the bug fixes, there are changes in the formula for calculate raw > > > value and a fix for mismatch in the devicetree property. > > > > > > Another general improvement for the driver is to use managed resources > > > for all allocated resources. > > > > > Hi Marcus, > > > > The first 3 fixes look good to me. Do you want me to pick those up to > > go in after rc1 via my togreg-fixes branch? The side effect of doing > > that is it'll be a little while before they are upstream in the branch > > I'll want to pick the rest of the series on top of. > > > > So it's a trade off between getting fixes in as soon as possible and > > slowing down other improvements a little. > > Both ways works for me. > I guess it is preferable to get the fixes in as soon as possible? > > If so, do you want me to rebase the series on your togreg-fixes branch > or wait to send v5 until the patches are upstream? > > Or simply keep sending the whole series? For now resend the whole series. I don't want to pick anything up onto the fixes-togreg branch until rc1 (as good time to get it to a more recent base). So I'll sit on these for another week anyway. Thanks, Jonathan > > Thanks, > Marcus Folkesson > > > > > Jonathan > >