diff mbox series

[v2,4/5] iio:adc:ti-adc128s052: drop of_match_ptr protection

Message ID 20200721171444.825099-5-jic23@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series iio:adc more of_match_ptr and similar removal | expand

Commit Message

Jonathan Cameron July 21, 2020, 5:14 p.m. UTC
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

There is no real advantage in having these protections and
for parts that do not have an explicit ACPI ID, it prevents the
use of PRP0001. I'm trying to clear this out of IIO in general
to avoid copying in new drivers.

Include mod_devicetable.h as we are using of_device_id in here so
including that header is best practice.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
---
 v1->v2
 * Mention that some parts of valid IDs, so we are interesting in
   enabling PRP0001 option for those that don't.
   
 drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko July 21, 2020, 6:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> There is no real advantage in having these protections and
> for parts that do not have an explicit ACPI ID, it prevents the
> use of PRP0001. I'm trying to clear this out of IIO in general
> to avoid copying in new drivers.
>
> Include mod_devicetable.h as we are using of_device_id in here so
> including that header is best practice.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>

> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
> ---
>  v1->v2
>  * Mention that some parts of valid IDs, so we are interesting in
>    enabling PRP0001 option for those that don't.
>
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> index e86f55ce093f..3143f35a6509 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>  #include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> @@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
>  static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name = "adc128s052",
> -               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match),
> +               .of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
>                 .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
>         },
>         .probe = adc128_probe,
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Jonathan Cameron Aug. 9, 2020, 2:07 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:32:03 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> >
> > There is no real advantage in having these protections and
> > for parts that do not have an explicit ACPI ID, it prevents the
> > use of PRP0001. I'm trying to clear this out of IIO in general
> > to avoid copying in new drivers.
> >
> > Include mod_devicetable.h as we are using of_device_id in here so
> > including that header is best practice.  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Applied,

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  v1->v2
> >  * Mention that some parts of valid IDs, so we are interesting in
> >    enabling PRP0001 option for those that don't.
> >
> >  drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > index e86f55ce093f..3143f35a6509 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> >  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> >  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> >  #include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > @@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
> >  static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
> >         .driver = {
> >                 .name = "adc128s052",
> > -               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match),
> > +               .of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
> >                 .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
> >         },
> >         .probe = adc128_probe,
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >  
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
index e86f55ce093f..3143f35a6509 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
 #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
 #include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
@@ -220,7 +221,7 @@  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
 static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "adc128s052",
-		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adc128_of_match),
+		.of_match_table = adc128_of_match,
 		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match),
 	},
 	.probe = adc128_probe,