diff mbox series

iio: adc: rn5t618-adc: use devm_iio_map_array_register() function

Message ID 20210926162859.3567685-1-aardelean@deviqon.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series iio: adc: rn5t618-adc: use devm_iio_map_array_register() function | expand

Commit Message

Alexandru Ardelean Sept. 26, 2021, 4:28 p.m. UTC
This driver already hooks a similar unwind callback via
devm_add_action_or_reset().

They pretty much do the same thing, so this change converts it to the
devm_iio_map_array_register().

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Andreas Kemnade Sept. 27, 2021, 8:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 19:28:59 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com> wrote:

> This driver already hooks a similar unwind callback via
> devm_add_action_or_reset().
> 
> They pretty much do the same thing, so this change converts it to the
> devm_iio_map_array_register().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c | 13 +------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

yes, looks sane, the patches it depens on are not in linux-next yet.
But it seems that they are accepted, so:

Reviewed-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Jonathan Cameron Sept. 30, 2021, 4:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:08:34 +0200
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 19:28:59 +0300
> Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com> wrote:
> 
> > This driver already hooks a similar unwind callback via
> > devm_add_action_or_reset().
> > 
> > They pretty much do the same thing, so this change converts it to the
> > devm_iio_map_array_register().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c | 13 +------------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)  
> 
> yes, looks sane, the patches it depens on are not in linux-next yet.
I was waiting for 0-day confirmation which for some reason has gone astray
(not problems reported either).  Ah well - I'll assume it's fine and
risk next breakage.

> But it seems that they are accepted, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Thanks and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git, pushed out as testing to
see if 0-day notices this time.

Thanks,

Jonathan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c
index c56fccb2c8e1..7d891b4ea461 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rn5t618-adc.c
@@ -197,13 +197,6 @@  static struct iio_map rn5t618_maps[] = {
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 
-static void unregister_map(void *data)
-{
-	struct iio_dev *iio_dev = (struct iio_dev *) data;
-
-	iio_map_array_unregister(iio_dev);
-}
-
 static int rn5t618_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -254,11 +247,7 @@  static int rn5t618_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = iio_map_array_register(iio_dev, rn5t618_maps);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-
-	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(adc->dev, unregister_map, iio_dev);
+	ret = devm_iio_map_array_register(adc->dev, iio_dev, rn5t618_maps);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;